2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.107142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mimicking nature for resilient resource and infrastructure network design

Abstract: Highlights Novel, bio-inspired resilient resource and infrastructure network design framework. Proposed framework only requires knowledge of network architecture. Valuable tool when information not available for high-fidelity analyses. Shown to be able to analyze complex resource and infrastructure networks. Validated network resilience improvement through supply chain case-study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Ahmadian et al (2020) have presented a model to test and improve the recovery capability during a disruptive event. Finally, a combined evaluation of resilience and sustainability has been proposed by Chatterjee & Layton (2020) ; these authors balanced redundancy and efficiency for optimizing the network configuration under normal conditions and unexpected events. Three quali-quantitative studies have evaluated resilience too, by presenting either general parameters to assess the level of readiness to disruptions ( Sureeyatanapas et al, 2020 ), or by evaluating the supply chain readiness with the aim of improving the preparation and reducing the decisional uncertainty in responding to the disruption ( Chowdhury & Quaddus, 2016 ), or by proposing a resilient supplier selection model in a disaster scenario to reduce the vulnerability of a supply chain system ( Haldar et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Ahmadian et al (2020) have presented a model to test and improve the recovery capability during a disruptive event. Finally, a combined evaluation of resilience and sustainability has been proposed by Chatterjee & Layton (2020) ; these authors balanced redundancy and efficiency for optimizing the network configuration under normal conditions and unexpected events. Three quali-quantitative studies have evaluated resilience too, by presenting either general parameters to assess the level of readiness to disruptions ( Sureeyatanapas et al, 2020 ), or by evaluating the supply chain readiness with the aim of improving the preparation and reducing the decisional uncertainty in responding to the disruption ( Chowdhury & Quaddus, 2016 ), or by proposing a resilient supplier selection model in a disaster scenario to reduce the vulnerability of a supply chain system ( Haldar et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interested readers may refer to previous work, which has adapted ENA for applications in industrial networks, [66][67][68][69][70][71] power grids, 72 water distribution networks, 73,74 and supply chains. 75 Consider the architecture presented in Figure 3(C). The goal is to represent the network architecture and its task-flows in an N X N flow matrix.…”
Section: Sos Architectures' Doso Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ecologists have developed methodologies and metrics to capture the resilient traits, such as ecological robustness (R ECO ), cycling index, and degree of system order (DoSO) [7], [8]. To mimic the resilient nature from ecosystems, such metrics have been used to guide the resilient design for various human-made networks, including water distribution networks [9], supply chains [10], and industrial by-product networks [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%