1992
DOI: 10.21236/ada253525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Millimeter Wave Measurement and Modeling of Terrain Scattering

Abstract: The view, opinions and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s) and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, or decision, unless so designated by other documentation. 12a. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2). Sequential beam footprints spatially overlap the scene and are thus at least partially correlated [27]. The footprint centre at subsequent azimuthal and elevation steps (c b (θ n , ϕ n )) is then a function of the spatial sampling interval in azimuth (∆θ) and elevation (∆ϕ):…”
Section: A Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…2). Sequential beam footprints spatially overlap the scene and are thus at least partially correlated [27]. The footprint centre at subsequent azimuthal and elevation steps (c b (θ n , ϕ n )) is then a function of the spatial sampling interval in azimuth (∆θ) and elevation (∆ϕ):…”
Section: A Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dust, fog) and precipitation, altering the radar received power from terrain and hence increase ranging uncertainties. Different surface types also exhibit unique radar backscatter characteristics under different viewing geometries [27] and this also impacts signal stability and hence ranging performance. For example, fluctuating targets such as vegetation are typically considered volume scatterers [38].…”
Section: B Avtis2 Point Cloud Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such a difference must be accounted for when evaluating the possible enhancement of the double bounce backscattering due to the inundation. We have assumed a simplified cosine model (Ulaby and Dobson, 1989), supposing that the variation of σ 0 with the incidence angle θ can be approximated by cos 2 (θ). With this hypothesis, if θ x and θ y are the incidence angles of image-1 and image-2, respectively, the quantity…”
Section: The Input Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The water/land contrast is of particular interest in the case of SWOT, because we need to automatically detect the continental water surfaces in HR mode and because it has an impact on the consequences of layover 4,5 . Based on Ulaby's measurements 6 , the Ka-band backscattering from water is expected to be much stronger than that of land surfaces for near-nadir viewing (of the order of 10 dB stronger in the incidence range of SWOT). However, these measurements are only representative of particular combinations of surface characteristics (roughness, soil humidity and composition, …).…”
Section: Modeling Of Radar Cross-section Of Natural Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%