2020
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2020.3016158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Millimeter-Wave Magneto-Electric Dipole Antenna Array With a Self-Supporting Geometry for Time-Saving Metallic 3-D Printing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PBF techniques allow the direct printing of metal components; however, surface roughness is a potential issue, which can increase loss. This technique was used to create waveguides and power dividers [18], a lightweight and cost-effective panel antenna in the millimeter waveband [19], a 3D beam scanning leaky wave antenna array at 30 GHz [20], and a wideband circularly polarized (CP) waveguide array antenna consisting of four antipodally ridged elements and a compact feeding network [21]. The example in [19] showed a comparison between a computer numerical control (CNC)-machined antenna and a SLS-printed antenna; on average, the SLS-printed antenna was 11% and 13% less efficient in the K-and Ka-bands, respectively, largely owing to increased surface roughness.…”
Section: D Printing With Conductive Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBF techniques allow the direct printing of metal components; however, surface roughness is a potential issue, which can increase loss. This technique was used to create waveguides and power dividers [18], a lightweight and cost-effective panel antenna in the millimeter waveband [19], a 3D beam scanning leaky wave antenna array at 30 GHz [20], and a wideband circularly polarized (CP) waveguide array antenna consisting of four antipodally ridged elements and a compact feeding network [21]. The example in [19] showed a comparison between a computer numerical control (CNC)-machined antenna and a SLS-printed antenna; on average, the SLS-printed antenna was 11% and 13% less efficient in the K-and Ka-bands, respectively, largely owing to increased surface roughness.…”
Section: D Printing With Conductive Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum gain results of the arrays are 28.0 and 33.6 dBi separately, while the variation is less than 4.5 dB throughout the operating band. The additional loss caused by the printed surface roughness of about 10 μm [35] has been considered in the simulation.…”
Section: Simulated Array Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional metallic pins [31]- [32] and irises [20], [33]- [34] were employed in the design of H-plane substrate-integrated and air-filled waveguide T-junctions to extend their operating bandwidths. Meanwhile, stepped or tapered waveguide structures are another kind of scheme to improve the impedance matching of both E-plane [16], [35] and H-plane [36] waveguide T-junctions. Benefiting from those wideband waveguide T-junctions, bandwidths of more than 30% have been achieved by several millimeter-wave arrays with promising radiation performance [16], [31]- [33], [35]- [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, 3-D metal printing technique has been introduced in mm-wave antenna designs, which has the merits of low cost and flexible construction ability [35]. In 2016, an all-metal waveguide reflectarray is presented [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%