2009
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/703/2/l142
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Millimeter Flares and Vlbi Visibilities From Relativistic Simulations of Magnetized Accretion Onto the Galactic Center Black Hole

Abstract: The recent VLBI observation of the Galactic center black hole candidate Sgr A* at 1.3mm shows source structure on event-horizon scales. This detection enables a direct comparison of the emission region with models of the accretion flow onto the black hole. We present the first results from time-dependent radiative transfer of general relativistic MHD simulation data, and compare simulated synchrotron images at black hole spin a = 0.9 with the VLBI measurements. After tuning the accretion rate to match the mill… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
145
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
8
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, these models are consistent with the observed millimeter variability of SgrA*. However, since Dexter et al (2009Dexter et al ( , 2010) concentrate only on modeling the (sub-)millimeter emission, their modeling could not reproduce the observed NIR/X-ray flares and corresponding (sub-)millimeter flares (Eckart et al 2008;Marrone et al 2008;Dodds-Eden et al 2009;Yusef-Zadeh et al 2008, which are most likely physically associated. The authors also clearly state that -in the framework of their modeling -it is unclear how their description of variability is linked to the NIR/X-ray flare activity.…”
Section: Sub-mm Variability From a Magnetized Accretion Flowmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, these models are consistent with the observed millimeter variability of SgrA*. However, since Dexter et al (2009Dexter et al ( , 2010) concentrate only on modeling the (sub-)millimeter emission, their modeling could not reproduce the observed NIR/X-ray flares and corresponding (sub-)millimeter flares (Eckart et al 2008;Marrone et al 2008;Dodds-Eden et al 2009;Yusef-Zadeh et al 2008, which are most likely physically associated. The authors also clearly state that -in the framework of their modeling -it is unclear how their description of variability is linked to the NIR/X-ray flare activity.…”
Section: Sub-mm Variability From a Magnetized Accretion Flowmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Observations and simulations consistently indicate that at frequencies above 200 GHz the variability amplitudes are of the order of 40%−50% (Garcia-Marin et al 2011a,b;Dexter et al 2009Dexter et al , 2010Li et al 2009;Marrone et al 2006aMarrone et al ,b, 2007. At lower frequencies (corresponding to wavelengths of 0.7 cm to 3.0 cm), the observed variability amplitudes are of the order of 10% (Macquart & Bower 2006;Bower et al 2002;Falcke et al 1998) or lower.…”
Section: Limits To the Degree Of Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The images from our simulations, however, have significant asymmetry, either because they are dominated by emission in the funnel or because of Doppler effects in the disk. In principle, in order to compare our simulations to the observed image size, we will need to calculate the predicted scattering broadened visibilities in the u−v plane and compare them directly to the data (as is done, e.g., in Broderick et al 2011a andin Dexter et al 2009). However, this introduces additional free parameters in the model, such as the orientation of the black-hole spin vector on the plane of the sky, and the current coverage of the u−v plane is too sparse to allow us to constrain the model parameters significantly better than the simple estimate of the size (see, e.g., the large areas within the confidence contours in Broderick et al 2011a andin Dexter et al 2009).…”
Section: Current Spectral and Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, owing to our use of a very fast radiative transport algorithm, instead of calculating the time-averaged properties of the simulated flows before constructing images and spectra like in many previous studies, we are able to calculate images and spectra for each snapshot of the flow, before averaging them together. This approach was also taken by Dexter et al (2009Dexter et al ( , 2010 and Dexter & Fragile (2013). Albeit computationally very expensive, it mimics more closely the averaging that will inevitably occur during the EHT observations and produces results that differ considerably from the alternate procedure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noble et al 2007;Mościbrodzka et al 2009;Dexter et al 2009Dexter et al , 2010. More recent models have even included polarization measurements (Shcherbakov et al 2012).…”
Section: Matching Simulations With Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%