2015
DOI: 10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

THE POWER OF IMAGING: CONSTRAINING THE PLASMA PROPERTIES OF GRMHD SIMULATIONS USING EHT OBSERVATIONS OF Sgr A*

Abstract: Recent advances in general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations have expanded and improved our understanding of the dynamics of black-hole accretion disks. However, current simulations do not capture the thermodynamics of electrons in the low density accreting plasma. This poses a significant challenge in predicting accretion flow images and spectra from first principles. Because of this, simplified emission models have often been used, with widely different configurations (e.g., disk-versus jet-domina… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

16
162
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
16
162
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of these ratios depend on poorly understood electron thermodynamics. However, assuming that (i) the dissipation of turbulence mainly heats the protons, (ii) the cooling time for the electrons is shorter than that of the protons, and (iii) the electron cooling time is shorter than the timescale for significant energy exchange between the electrons and protons, we expect these temperature ratios to be greater than unity (Yuan & Narayan 2014;Chan et al 2015a). Furthermore, because of the similarities between AGN and the low/hard state in XRBs, we assume that the physics of electron heating and cooling is the same across these systems.…”
Section: Disk and Jet Electron Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The values of these ratios depend on poorly understood electron thermodynamics. However, assuming that (i) the dissipation of turbulence mainly heats the protons, (ii) the cooling time for the electrons is shorter than that of the protons, and (iii) the electron cooling time is shorter than the timescale for significant energy exchange between the electrons and protons, we expect these temperature ratios to be greater than unity (Yuan & Narayan 2014;Chan et al 2015a). Furthermore, because of the similarities between AGN and the low/hard state in XRBs, we assume that the physics of electron heating and cooling is the same across these systems.…”
Section: Disk and Jet Electron Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, because of the similarities between AGN and the low/hard state in XRBs, we assume that the physics of electron heating and cooling is the same across these systems. We therefore choose a range of values of d  and j  motivated by fitting to Sgr A * and M87, since these are the only sources whose spectra have been fitted to constrain these parameters Mościbrodzka et al 2014;Mościbrodzka & Falcke 2013;Chan et al 2015a;Moscibrodzka et al 2015).…”
Section: Disk and Jet Electron Temperaturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Tracking and resolving magnetic reconnection events and their subsequent flaring within GRMHD simulations (e.g. De Villiers et al 2003;Mościbrodzka et al 2014;Chan et al 2015) will naturally provide a more realistic dynamical model for the plasmoid motion and ejection. Nevertheless, self-consistently coupling such simulations with radiative transfer calculations is beyond the scope of this work and it is more appropriate to leave it for future studies.…”
Section: Dynamics Of Plasmoid Ejectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until recently, the least understood part of these models was a proper treatment of radiating electrons. Finally, however, this issue has been addressed [13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. With new and more detailed observations, we are beginning to directly compare the numerical simulations of accretion flows to real astronomical systems such as Galactic center Sgr A* and the core of M87 galaxy [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%