Millennial Dental Hygiene Students’ Learning Preferences Compared to Non‐Millennial Faculty Members’ Teaching Methods: A National Study

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the learning preferences of millennial dental hygiene students (born between 1982 and 2002) in the U.S. with the teaching methods used by their non-millennial instructors. Cross-sectional surveys were developed with 21-item, five-point Likert scales to examine students' preferences for and faculty use of lecture, collaborative activities, technology, independent work, and group discussion. Surveys were emailed to U.S. dental hygiene program directors in September 2015. The respondents totaled 800 students and 343 faculty members-approximately 5% of all dental hygiene students and 6.8% of all dental hygiene faculty members in the U.S. The results showed that the responding faculty members (88.7%) used case studies more than the students (61.2%) preferred and that the students (71.4%) preferred games when learning more than the faculty members (57.2%) used them (p<0.0001). Student respondents (82.1%) preferred handouts for lecture more than did the faculty respondents (58.8%; p<0.0001). Faculty respondents expected students to read before class 39.3% more than student respondents read (p<0.0001). Student respondents preferred study guides for exams 39.2% more than the faculty respondents provided them (p<0.0001). Participating faculty members (84.0%) had students work in groups more than these students preferred (57.8%), and 92% of these faculty members used group activities in class (p<0.0001). The responses of the millennial dental hygiene students in this study were consistent with previous research on millennial traits. This study found areas of disagreement between students and faculty members on the use of case studies, study guides, and group work. Although these students stated they preferred lecture over group work, trends in education stress using active learning over lecture.Ms.

The importance of student monitoring in academic learning: a two-year follow-up

“…Justifiably, the peculiarity that the monitor when studying the subject himself went through the same difficulties and requisitions made it easy the way he performed his duties, the way he should transmit the information to the monitored students, as well as the understanding related to the problems the students faced and the applicable measure to answer their questionings 10 . According Coelho, from the moment that education starts to understand the principles of the learning process, the problems that may occur in this area will be treated and solved without taboos and without traumas.…”

“…In relation to the total number of failures in the night-time course in the year of 2016, being of 0%, is mainly justifiable for the smaller number of students in class and in a way this made possible to have greater control and perception over the students individual difficulties, as a result, knowledge and information transmission were done in a holistic manner, since the students difficulties were clear, everyone could expose their its setback with less shyness, even because collective experience allowed greater exposition and the immediate feedback cooperated in the students critical analysis development 10 . Another explanation is based on the average class size making it able to combine a diversity of students profile with the monitor's attention.…”

Dental Students' Use of Student‐Managed Google Docs and Other Technologies in Collaborative Learning

“…Since the early 1980s, however, educators have expressed concerns about children raised with computer‐based technology 1 . Twenty years later, researchers called those children “digital natives,” who were said to speak a digital language that their predecessors did not understand 2 – 4 . These “native speakers” were reared with instantaneous informatics and audiovisual multimedia images and were said by the same researchers to be unlike any other generation before them in how they learned.…”

“…A decade later a new term for these individuals, the Net Generation (NG) Millennials, emerged 4 . Some argued that NG adults needed immediate satisfaction, accepted answers only from Google, and had isolated social interactions 1, 2,4, 5…”

Learning strategies among adult CHD fellows

“…Millennials who grew up during the age of digitalisation are now embarking on subspecialty training and may have different learning styles compared to previous generations; many of them are now in the role of programme directors. 11 To gain insight and facilitate effective subspecialty training, the International Society for Adult Congenital Heart Disease conducted a survey among current and recently graduated fellows on their strategies and preferences for adult CHD education.…”