2009
DOI: 10.22358/jafs/66417/2009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milk yield and composition in line 05 dairy ewes as related to somatic cell counts

Abstract: A total of 1512 milk samples from udder halves was collected at monthly intervals from 189 line 05 dairy ewes throughout milking periods. Each ewe was tested 4 times. Milk composition was examined in terms of somatic cell contents (SCC) in ewe milk in three groups: group 0 consisted of ewes that on each test day had ≤250 × 10 3 cells/ml in left and right udder halves, group 1 comprised ewes with ≤250 × 10 3 in one half of the udder and >250 × 10 3 cells/ml in the other half, whereas group 2 contained ewes that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
6
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The same pattern was found by Serrano et al (2003) and Riggio et al (2007), however these authors considered somatic cell score (SCS = log 2 (SCC/100) + 3) in analyses. Correlation coefficients between transformed SCC and milk traits obtained in our study differed from literature (Riggio et al, 2007;Olechnowicz et al, 2009): slightly stronger relationships were found for Valle del Belice ewes (correlations between SCS and daily milk yield, between SCS and fat content, and between SCS and protein content, equalled −0.12, +0.14 and +0.25, respectively) and for Polish Line 05 ewes (correlations between logSCC and fat content, between log SCC and protein content, and between logSCC and lactose content were +0.24, +0.18 and −0.49, respectively). Similarly, slightly stronger correlations were found for Manchega ewes by Serrano et al (2003).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same pattern was found by Serrano et al (2003) and Riggio et al (2007), however these authors considered somatic cell score (SCS = log 2 (SCC/100) + 3) in analyses. Correlation coefficients between transformed SCC and milk traits obtained in our study differed from literature (Riggio et al, 2007;Olechnowicz et al, 2009): slightly stronger relationships were found for Valle del Belice ewes (correlations between SCS and daily milk yield, between SCS and fat content, and between SCS and protein content, equalled −0.12, +0.14 and +0.25, respectively) and for Polish Line 05 ewes (correlations between logSCC and fat content, between log SCC and protein content, and between logSCC and lactose content were +0.24, +0.18 and −0.49, respectively). Similarly, slightly stronger correlations were found for Manchega ewes by Serrano et al (2003).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 93%
“…In contrast, respective values estimated by Margetín et al (1995) for TS and IV ewes were more than two times lower. Olechnowicz et al (2009) reported log SCC · ml −1 as 5.19 for Polish Line 05 dairy sheep which fell between values estimated in this study for IV and TS ewes. Similarly, Skapetas et al (2017) estimated log SCC · ml −1 as 5.30 for Chios sheep which was almost the same as values found either for TS × LS or for IV × LC crossbred ewes.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Especially in the farm third and fourth, with higher number of animals, there was seen high numerical decrease of milk yield between group SCC <0.2 × 10 6 cells.mL -1 and SCC >10 6 cells.mL -1 . We found out also numerical reduction of milk production in ewes with high SCC (Olechnowicz et al, 2009) there was found out significant increase of fat, protein and lactose content with increasing SCC in milk. Though not significant in this study we also confirm the decrease of lactose with high SCC in milk.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…At present the somatic cell count (SCC) is considered to be a basis for abnormal milk control programs for cows, goats and sheep (Bergonier-Berthelot, 2003;Zajac et al, 2016). Higher number of SCC reduced milk production and negatively affects other variables (lactose) and positive fat and protein contents (Olechnowicz et al, 2009;Rupp et al, 2003). In spite of negative effect of SCC on milk production, in dairy ewes there is not legislative duty to analyse raw milk of ewes for SCC for the market purposes as it is in dairy cow well established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%