2001
DOI: 10.2527/2001.7961386x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milk production of crossbred daughters of high- and low-milk EPD Angus and Hereford bulls.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
28
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, milk yield level (4 to 5 kg/day) was in agreement with previous reports of milk production in a similar environment (Quintans et al, 2010) and with CR daughters of low milk-expected progeny difference A and H bulls (Minick et al, 2001). Thus, these results taken together suggest that the onset of lactation, in this study milk production, is not as much of an energetic challenge to the beef cow, and that the molecular mechanism that explains the uncoupling of the GH-IGF axis in early lactation of highproducing dairy cows is probably related to genetic selection for milk production.…”
Section: Hepatic Expression Of Somatotropic Axis Genessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the present study, milk yield level (4 to 5 kg/day) was in agreement with previous reports of milk production in a similar environment (Quintans et al, 2010) and with CR daughters of low milk-expected progeny difference A and H bulls (Minick et al, 2001). Thus, these results taken together suggest that the onset of lactation, in this study milk production, is not as much of an energetic challenge to the beef cow, and that the molecular mechanism that explains the uncoupling of the GH-IGF axis in early lactation of highproducing dairy cows is probably related to genetic selection for milk production.…”
Section: Hepatic Expression Of Somatotropic Axis Genessupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However in the one study to date of cow maternal behavior, cows do not show any sex biases in nursing behavior [18]. In beef cattle that are reared by their dam, sons are born bigger and have better post-natal growth than do daughters, but only one out of three studies has shown any evidence of male-biased milk synthesis [44][45][46]. In the absence of post-natal behavioral modifications of prenatal mammary gland programming, the presence and concentration of other milk bioactives such as immunofactors and hormones that influence offspring development [35] may differ in milk produced for sons and daughters.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although intensive artificial selection has shaped cattle during recent centuries, domesticated cattle are derived from large-bodied, sexuallydimorphic aurochs (Bos primigenius) [42][43]. Among beef cattle, several small studies have revealed sex-biased milk production that favors sons [44], favors daughters [45], or no sex-biases [46]. In contrast, standardized husbandry practices, systematic milking procedures, detailed record-keeping, and large samples sizes make the dairy cow a powerful model for the exploration of maternal milk synthesis from both functional and mechanistic perspectives [35,[47][48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The milk yield of dams belongs to the most important factors affecting the body weights of calves at weaning. Clutter and Nielsen (1987) as well as Minick et al (2001) concluded that the milk yield is responsible for daily gains of calves at 60%, and the high-yielding cows nurse calves that are heavier at weaning. Numerous reports state that the highest milk yield is attained by Simmental cows, while Hereford cows reach definitely worse results (Fiss and Wilton, 1992;Gregory et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%