2015
DOI: 10.1080/09064702.2015.1052545
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Milk fat depression syndrome and the particular case of grazing cows: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed milk fat increase is contrary to other observations on pasture [ 40 , 41 ] but could be an effect of increased fiber intake, underlining the effects of different grazing systems [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…The observed milk fat increase is contrary to other observations on pasture [ 40 , 41 ] but could be an effect of increased fiber intake, underlining the effects of different grazing systems [ 5 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 96%
“…The high proportion of C18:3 in milk of grazing cows is due to the high amount of this FA in the galactosyl diacylglycerols constituting the thylakoids [ 343 ], the main membrane structure of the chloroplast. Due to the large amount of PUFA and the concomitant high fermentability, fresh pasture can induce milk fat depression [ 344 ]. However, the rumen dynamic of biohydrogenation of PUFA in fresh grazing plants is complex and is affected by several factors, as reviewer by Buccioni et al [ 343 ].…”
Section: Role Of Dietary Fatty Acids On Milk Fa Composition and Healtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decrease in milk fat production and concentration is expected when cows grazed on high-quality pastures supplemented with a high concentrate level (upon 6 kg DM/day) [ 1 , 55 , 69 ], related to a decrease in ruminal pH [ 70 ]. Thus, the equal and low levels of supplements offered in this study, being less than 20% of the total DMI, could be insufficient to decrease the concentration and yield of milk fat [ 71 , 72 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%