2022
DOI: 10.1177/00104140211066209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Military Conscription and Nonviolent Resistance

Abstract: Nonviolent campaigns against repressive regimes often turn on the military’s decision to either defend the ruler or make common cause with the ruled. Yet surprisingly little scholarship investigates opposition expectations for the military’s likely response to mass protest. We theorize that some determinants of the military’s willingness to repress are more observable to activists than others. In particular, we identify conscription as a highly salient indicator that soldiers will refuse to fire on protesters … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We first examine protest onset, or an individual’s decision to take to the streets. Among the many factors shaping this decision is one’s expectations of repression and retribution (Ritter & Conrad, 2016; Young, 2019; Cebul & Grewal, 2022). If individuals anticipate being arrested, tortured, or killed by the security forces or other armed groups, they are less likely to turn out.…”
Section: Political Violence and Its Legaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We first examine protest onset, or an individual’s decision to take to the streets. Among the many factors shaping this decision is one’s expectations of repression and retribution (Ritter & Conrad, 2016; Young, 2019; Cebul & Grewal, 2022). If individuals anticipate being arrested, tortured, or killed by the security forces or other armed groups, they are less likely to turn out.…”
Section: Political Violence and Its Legaciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since World War II, the United States has maintained a large standing military, which in 1973 transitioned to an all-volunteer force in which individuals self-select to join and maintain careers in the military. 2 A volunteer military produces distance between society and the military because those who self-select to join are not necessarily representative of society, and, unlike conscripts, often serve for long periods of time, severing their connection to their civilian identities (Feaver and Kohn 2001;Cebul and Grewal 2022).…”
Section: The Sources Of Superioritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lee, 2009T. Lee, , 2015Lutscher, 2016;Makara, 2013Makara, , 2016McLauchlin, 2010McLauchlin, , 2018Morency-Laflamme, 2018;Prieur, 2011;Ritter, 2014;Tolstrup et al, 2019;Yap & Chu, 2015) and psychological explanations focused on identity, ideas, and moral costs (Cebul & Grewal, 2022;Chenoweth & Stephan, 2011;Greitens, 2016, pp. 51-52;T.…”
Section: Social Distance In the Context Of Military Response To Revol...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing theories of military responses to revolution generally fall into one of two categories: material explanations employing a cost–benefit rationale (Albrecht, 2015; Ambrosio, 2014; Bellin, 2004, 2012; Bou Nassif, 2013, 2015; Calculli, 2013; Koehler, 2017; Koehler et al, 2016; Koren, 2014; Kraemer, 2014; T. Lee, 2009, 2015; Lutscher, 2016; Makara, 2013, 2016; McLauchlin, 2010, 2018; Morency-Laflamme, 2018; Prieur, 2011; Ritter, 2014; Tolstrup et al, 2019; Yap & Chu, 2015) and psychological explanations focused on identity, ideas, and moral costs (Cebul & Grewal, 2022; Chenoweth & Stephan, 2011; Greitens, 2016, pp. 51–52; T.…”
Section: “Virtuous Shirking” By the Military And Social Distancementioning
confidence: 99%