2006
DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000249117.23318.e1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mild cognitive impairment

Abstract: It has been assumed that each MCI subtype is associated with an increased risk for a particular type of dementia. We can only partially agree with this.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

31
414
6
17

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 506 publications
(468 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
31
414
6
17
Order By: Relevance
“…Petersen et al (1999) suggests a cutoff of 1.5 SD below the mean to designate memory impairment. Busse et al (2006) reported cutoff scores at 1 SD below the mean were more sensitive in detecting subjects who later converted to AD. It is possible that adjusting the cutoff thresholds might improve the ability to detect early memory changes in subjects with high cognitive reserve.…”
Section: Dm Rentz Et Almentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Petersen et al (1999) suggests a cutoff of 1.5 SD below the mean to designate memory impairment. Busse et al (2006) reported cutoff scores at 1 SD below the mean were more sensitive in detecting subjects who later converted to AD. It is possible that adjusting the cutoff thresholds might improve the ability to detect early memory changes in subjects with high cognitive reserve.…”
Section: Dm Rentz Et Almentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Research on MCI has received much attention in the past decade as researchers and clinicians have pushed for early identification and treatment of dementia. Current research suggests that older adults with MCI are more likely to progress to dementia than their counterparts without MCI (Albert, Blacker, Moss, Tanzi, & McArdle, 2007;Busse, Hensel, Gühne, Angermeyer, & Riedel-Heller, 2006;Landau et al, 2010;Petersen et al, 2001). Petersen and colleagues (2001) reported that most MCI subjects with memory impairment progressed to Alzheimer's disease at a rate of 10% to 15% per annum, in comparison to those healthy controls whose progressed a rate was 1% to 2 %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Siguiendo esta lógica, a partir de la concreción de un consenso diagnóstico internacional, se ha podido dividir el DCL en diversos subgrupos en función del número y tipo de dominios cognitivos afectados, si bien existen discrepancias en los estudios en cuanto a su número (Busse, Hensel, Günhe, Angermeyer y Riedel-Heller, 2006;…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…La solución a esta problemática llegó con la adopción internacional de los criterios establecidos por Petersen para el DCL (Petersen, Doody, Kurz, Mohs, Morris y Rabins, 2001). Estos se definen a partir de la observación, durante al menos seis meses, de los siguientes síntomas: a) quejas subjetivas de memoria, preferiblemente reveladas por informadores fiables; b) quejas subjetivas de una o varias áreas cognitivas, preferiblemente reveladas por informadores fiables; c) deterioro cognitivo, en memoria o algún otro dominio cognitivo, de al menos 1.5 DT por debajo de la media para el grupo etario y educativo pertinente; d) actividades de la vida diaria preservadas (el paciente puede, no obstante, presentar dificultades en las actividades complejas del día a día) y e) ausencia de demencia.Siguiendo esta lógica, a partir de la concreción de un consenso diagnóstico internacional, se ha podido dividir el DCL en diversos subgrupos en función del número y tipo de dominios cognitivos afectados, si bien existen discrepancias en los estudios en cuanto a su número (Busse, Hensel, Günhe, Angermeyer y Riedel-Heller, 2006; …”
unclassified