2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(99)00893-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration time correction for the analysis of derivatized amino acids and oligosaccharides by micellar capillary electrochromatography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The generation of a fluorescence signal by commercial ampholytes was reported by Righetti in 1975, and appears to persist in the current reagents [36]. The features in the background electropherogram focus quite tightly with a width of less than 1 s. Their emission spectrum shifts with excitation wavelength.…”
Section: Calibration Curve and Detection Limits For Labeled Proteinmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The generation of a fluorescence signal by commercial ampholytes was reported by Righetti in 1975, and appears to persist in the current reagents [36]. The features in the background electropherogram focus quite tightly with a width of less than 1 s. Their emission spectrum shifts with excitation wavelength.…”
Section: Calibration Curve and Detection Limits For Labeled Proteinmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…2, this IS migrated earlier than the EOF marker (that corresponds to the negative peak in the figure), indicating that the sign of its electro- phoretical mobility is opposite to that of EPO bands. It is known that among the characteristics of a substance to be considered as a good IS, its electrophoretical properties should be very similar to that of the studied analyte to compensate the effects of nonideality on the electrophoretic mobility, and that the more different is the mobility of a compound respect to that of the marker, the worse is the precision [12,16]. In our case, finding an adequate IS was not an easy task.…”
Section: Performance Of the Different Migration Parametersmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Some of the studies include the comparison of different parameters such as migration time, relative migration, electrophoretic mobili-ty, actual mobility, and relative mobility [11][12][13][14][15][16]. A different approach makes use of the effective electrophoretic mobility of known markers to determine the electrophoretic mobility of the compound of interest [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The migration times presented in Table 3 are raw data. Reproducibility could be improved slightly by normalizing the migration times using two-peak method [36], although the effect is less dramatic at low pH were the electroosmotic flow is essentially nil, so this was not done. Mean RSD: 1.5% (n = 3)…”
Section: Reproducibility Of Cze Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%