1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf01405628
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migration or extrusion of shunt catheters

Abstract: SummaryThree cases with unusual complications of shunting procedures are reported. These were migration of the peritoneal catheter into the mediastinum following an operation for a ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt, extrusion of the peritoneal catheter through a well-healed abdominal incision in an adult following a VP shunt operation, and migration of the subdural catheter into the brain substance causing increased intracranial pressure following a subduroperitoneal shunt operation. The possible mechanisms lead… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Alonso-Vanegas et al 4 reported that the patient's position, postprandial gastric distension, and diaphragm movements are other risk factors for chronic irritation in the region of contact with the stomach, which could lead to perforation. 4,5 In the case herein reported, intraoperatively, it was possible to visualize areas of chronic inflammation and the respective fibrosis around the catheter, as was found in most studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] in which there was perforation of abdominal organs; however, no perforation of the gastric wall was evidenced through the VP shunt catheter. Moreover, in other studies, [5][6][7] CSF culture revealed infection by Staphylococcus capitis and Enterobacter cloacae, which was linked to distal catheter migration in the stomach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Alonso-Vanegas et al 4 reported that the patient's position, postprandial gastric distension, and diaphragm movements are other risk factors for chronic irritation in the region of contact with the stomach, which could lead to perforation. 4,5 In the case herein reported, intraoperatively, it was possible to visualize areas of chronic inflammation and the respective fibrosis around the catheter, as was found in most studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] in which there was perforation of abdominal organs; however, no perforation of the gastric wall was evidenced through the VP shunt catheter. Moreover, in other studies, [5][6][7] CSF culture revealed infection by Staphylococcus capitis and Enterobacter cloacae, which was linked to distal catheter migration in the stomach.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The procedures of choice include infection control with antibiotics, section of the point of obstruction, external proximal drainage, repositioning of the catheter, and a new procedure to remove the current catheter and insert another VP shunt on the contralateral side. 3,[8][9][10][11] Therefore, the treatment chosen for our patient was the removal of the obstructed part of the catheter, without the need to insert a new VP shunt. However, the access route for catheter removal was not through exploratory laparotomy, as usual, but through videolaparoscopy, given that no signs of peritoneal irritation were found.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2,5,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] It has been emphasised that the development of scrotal swelling or hydrocoele in a child with a VP shunt should raise the possibility of a shunt complication. 14 An explanation of the migration of the peritoneal catheter is difficult but migration of the peritoneal catheter into the scrotum tends to occur in younger children because of the higher incidence of an unobliterated processus vaginalis and smaller volume of the peritoneal cavity in these patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported two cases of spontaneous dissection of a Raimondi catheter among 23 cases, and several similar cases were reported. [1121365] Oktem et al . [10] have reported migration of the peritoneal catheter into the scrotum through the unobliterated processus vaginalis; however, the tube was not dissected in all of those cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%