1965
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.1965.tb04300.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Migraine and Heredity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
3

Year Published

1971
1971
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…He found family records in 91.4% of the patients, and the analysis of his data led him to the conclusion that migraine is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait. Dalsgaard-Nielsen [5] and Dalsgaard-Nielsen and Ulrich [6] reported a positive family his tory of headache in 61 % of 461 Danish doc tors in 1965 and in a later report, 90% were positive. The difference between the two groups was postulated to be due to the more detailed nature of the investigation in the later study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He found family records in 91.4% of the patients, and the analysis of his data led him to the conclusion that migraine is inherited as an autosomal dominant trait. Dalsgaard-Nielsen [5] and Dalsgaard-Nielsen and Ulrich [6] reported a positive family his tory of headache in 61 % of 461 Danish doc tors in 1965 and in a later report, 90% were positive. The difference between the two groups was postulated to be due to the more detailed nature of the investigation in the later study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, familial occurrence of migraine may represent chance clustering of this highly prevalent disease. Family and twin studies have produced conflicting results with respect to the mode of inheritance of migraine (Allan 1928;Goodell et al 1954: Dalsgaard-Nielsen 1965Barolin and Sperlich 1969;Baler 1985;Devoto et al 1986;D'Amico et al 1991;Russell et al 1993;Mochi et al 1993;Lucas 1977;Ziegler et al 1975). This confusion is at least partly a result of methodological differences and shortcomings (Russell et al, 1993;Haan et al 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Esses sintomas são: distúrbio de sono (DS), dor abdominal recorrente (DAR), cinetose (C), hiper¬ atividade (H), vertigens (V), dores do crescimento (DC), vômitos cíclicos (VC) e pseudoangina (P) 1,3,5,9-12,14,17-19,22,24.27,30,33-35,37 . O antecedente familiar é também considerado um dado importante para o diagnóstico de enxaqueca 2,4,6,8,9,31 .…”
unclassified