Midrapidity<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>φ</mml:mi></mml:math>production in Au+Au collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>NN</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>130</mml:mn><mml:mn /></mml:math>GeV

Adler, C.; Ahammed, Z.; Allgower, C.; Amonett, J.; Anderson, B. D.; Anderson, M.; Averichev, G. S.; Balewski, J.; Barannikova, O.; Barnby, L. S.; Baudot, J.; Bekele, S.; Belaga, V. V.; Bellwied, R.; Berger, J.; Bichsel, H.; Bland, L. C.; Blyth, C. O.; Bonner, B. E.; Boucham, A.; Brandin, A. V.; Cadman, R. V.; Caines, H.; Sánchez, M. Calderón De La Barca; Cardenas, A.; Carroll, J.; Castillo, J.; Castro, M.; Cebra, D.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Chen, M. L.; Chen, Y.; Chernenko, S.; Cherney, M.; Chikanian, A.; Choi, Bong‐Hyuk; Christie, W.; Coffin, J. P.; Cormier, Thomas Michael; Cramer, J. G.; Crawford, H. J.; DeMello, M.; Deng, W.; Derevschikov, A. A.; Didenko, L.; Draper, J. E.; Dunin, V. B.; Dunlop, J. C.; Eckardt, V.; Efimov, L. G.; Емелянов, В.; Engelage, J.; Eppley, G.; Erazmus, B.; Fachini, P.; Faine, V.; Finch, E.; Fisyak, Y.; Flierl, D.; Foley, K. J.; Fu, Jiang; Gagunashvili, N.; Gans, J.; Gaudichet, L.; Germain, M.; Geurts, F. J. M.; Ghazikhanian, V.; Grabski, J.; Grachov, O.; Greiner, D.; Grigoriev, V.; Guedon, M.; Gushin, E.; Hallman, T. J.; Hardtke, D.; Harris, J. W.; Heffner, M.; Heppelmann, S.; Herston, T.; Hippolyte, B.; Hirsch, A.; Hjort, E.; Hoffmann, G. W.; Horsley, M.; Huang, H. Z.; Humanic, T. J.; Hümmler, Holm Gero; Igo, G.; Ishihara, A.; Ivanshin, Yu.; Jacobs, P.; Jacobs, W. W.; Janik, M. A.; Johnson, I.; Jones, P. G.; Judd, E. G.; Kaneta, M.; Kaplan, M.; Keane, D.; Kisiel, A.; Klay, J.; Klein, S. R.; Klyachko, A.; Константинов, А. С.; Kotchenda, L.; Kovalenko, A. D.; Krämer, M.; Кравцов, П.; Krueger, K.; Kuhn, C.; Куликов, А. И.; Kunde, G. J.; Kunz, C. L.; Kutuev, R.Kh.; Кузнецов, А. А.; Lakéhal-Ayat, L.; Lamas-Valverde, J.; Lamont, M. A.C.; Landgraf, J. M.; Lange, S.; Lansdell, C. P.; Lasiuk, B.; Laue, F.; Lebedev, A.; LeCompte, T.; Lednický, R.; Leontiev, V. M.; LeVine, M. J.; Li, Q.; Lindenbaum, S. J.; Lisa, M. A.; Ljubičić, T.; Llope, W. J.; LoCurto, G.; Long, H.; Longacre, R. S.; Lopez-Noriega, M.; Love, W. A.; Lynn, D.; Majka, R.; Margetis, S.; Martin, L.; Marx, J. N.; Matis, H. S.; Matulenko, Yu. A.; McShane, T. S.; Meißner, F.; Melnick, Yu; Meschanin, A.; Messer, M.; Miller, Michael L.; Milosevich, Z.; Minaev, N. G.; Mitchell, J. T.; Moiseenko, V. A.; Moltz, D. M.; Moore, C. F.; Morozov, V.; Moura, M. M. de; Munhoz, M. G.; Mutchler, G. S.; Nelson, J. M.; Nevski, P.; Никитин, В. А.; Nogach, L. V.; Norman, B.; Nurushev, S. B.; Odyniec, G.; Ogawa, A.; Окороков, В. А.; Oldenburg, M.; Olson, D.; Paić, G.; Pandey, S. U.; Panebratsev, Y.; Panitkin, S.; Pavlinov, A. I.; Pawlak, T.; Perevoztchikov, V.; Peryt, W.; Петров, В. А.; Platner, E.D.; Pluta, J.; Porile, N.; Porter, J.; Poskanzer, A. M.; Potrebenikova, E.; Prindle, D.; Pruneau, C.; Radomski, S.; Rai, G.; Ravel, O.; Ray, R. L.; Razin, S. V.; Reichhold, D.; Reid, J. G.; Retière, F.; Ridiger, A.; Ritter, H.G.; Roberts, J.; Rogachevski, O. V.; Romero, J. L.; Roy, C.; Russ, D.; Rykov, V. L.; Sakrejda, I.; Sandweiss, J.; Saulys, A. C.; Savin, I.; Schambach, J.; Scharenberg, R. P.; Schmitz, N.; Schroeder, L. S.; Schüttauf, A.; Schweda, K.; Seger, J.; Seliverstov, D. M.; Seyboth, P.; Shahaliev, E.; Shestermanov, K. E.; Shimanskii, S. S.; Shvetcov, V. S.; Škoro, G.; Smirnov, N.; Snellings, Raimond; Sowiński, J.; Spinka, H. M.; Srivastava, B.; Stephenson, E. J.; Stock, R.; Stolpovsky, A.; Strikhanov, M.; Stringfellow, B.; Struck, C.; Suaide, Alexandre Alarcon Do Passo; Sugarbaker, E.; Suire, C.; Šumbera, M.; Symons, T. J. M.; Toledo, A. Szanto de; Szarwas, P.; Takahashi, J.; Tang, A. H.; Thomas, J. H.; Tikhomirov, V. O.; Trainor, T. A.; Trentalange, S.; Tokarev, M.; Tonjes, M. B.; Trofimov, V.; Tsai, O. D.; Turner, K.; Ullrich, T.; Underwood, D. G.; Buren, G. Van; VanderMolen, A. M.; Vanyashin, A.; Vasilevski, I. M.; Vasiliev, A.; Vigdor, S. E.; Voloshin, S. A.; Wang, F.; Ward, H.; Watson, J. W.; Wells, R.; Wenaus, T.; Westfall, G. D.; Whitten, C.; Wieman, H.; Willson, R.; Wissink, S. W.; Witt, R.; Xu, N.; Xu, Z.; Yakutin, A. E.; Yamamoto, E.; Yang, Jing; Yepes, P.; Yokosawa, A.; Yurevich, V. I.; Zanevski, Y. V.; Zborovský, I.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, W. M.; Zoulkarneev, R.; Zubarev, A. N.

doi:10.1103/physrevc.65.041901

Cited by 92 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[6], here we analyzed only the NA49 mid-rapidity data [27][28][29][30][31][32], being the most difficult ones to reproduce. Since RHIC high-energy data of different collaborations agree well with each other, we analyzed the STAR results for √ s N N = 9.2 [35][36][37][38], and 200 GeV [38][39][40].…”

Section: Novel Irregularities At Chemical Fomentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the one hand, this fact demonstrates that despite the large error bars the performed analysis of the entropy per baryon, total pion number per baryon, and thermal pion number per baryon extracted from the data at chemical FO is able to detect hidden correlations between the plateaus in these quantities. On the other hand, if the plateaus at laboratory energies [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] GeV are also generated by a mixed-phase instability, as it is the case for the set of plateaus found at lower collision energies, then this may provide evidence for a second phase transition.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Thermodynamically anomalous regions and possible new signals of mixed-phase formation

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Using an advanced version of the hadron resonance gas model we have found indications for irregularities in data for hadrons produced in relativistic heavy-ion collisions.These include an abrupt change of the effective number of degrees of freedom, a change of the slope of the ratio of lambda hyperons to protons at laboratory energies 8.6-11.6 AGeV, as well as highly correlated plateaus in the collision-energy dependence of the entropy per baryon, total pion number per baryon, and thermal pion number per baryon at laboratory energies 6.9-11.6 AGeV. Also, we observe a sharp peak in the dimensionless trace anomaly at a laboratory energy of 11.6 AGeV. On the basis of the generalized shock-adiabat model we demonstrate that these observations give evidence for the anomalous thermodynamic properties of the mixed phase at its boundary to the quark-gluon plasma. We argue that the trace-anomaly peak and the local minimum of the generalized specific volume observed at a laboratory energy of 11.6 AGeV provide a signal for the formation of a mixed phase between the quark-gluon plasma and the hadron phase. This naturally explains the change of slope in the energy dependence of the yield of lambda hyperons per proton at a laboratory energy of 8.6 GeV. 25.75.Nq Quark deconfinement, quark-gluon plasma production, and phase transitions 25.75.-q Relativistic heavy-ion collisions 25.75.Dw Particle and resonance production arXiv:1412.0718v2 [nucl-th]

show abstract

Section: Novel Irregularities At Chemical Fomentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Thermodynamically anomalous regions and possible new signals of mixed-phase formation

et al. 2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Data Analysis: − We have used AGS [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65], SPS [66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75], RHIC [76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91] and LHC [92][93][94][95] data for our analysis. STAR BES data has been used following [49,96,97].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Novel scheme for parametrizing the chemical freeze-out surface in heavy ion collision experiments

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We have used AGS [62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70], SPS [71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80], RHIC [81][82][83][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96] and LHC [97][98][99][100] data for our analysis. The data for STAR BES is obtained from Ref [48,55,101].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systematics of chemical freeze-out parameters in heavy-ion collision experiments

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We discuss systematic uncertainties in the chemical freeze-out parameters from the χ 2 analysis of hadron multiplicity ratios in the heavy-ion collision experiments. The systematics due to the choice of specific hadron ratios are found to lie within the experimental uncertainties. The variations obtained by removing the usual constraints on the conserved charges show similar behavior. The net charge to net baryon ratios in such unconstrained systems are commensurate with the expected value obtained from the protons and neutrons of the colliding nuclei up to the center of mass energies ∼ 40 GeV. Beyond that the uncertainties in this ratio gradually increases, possibly indicating the reduction in baryon stopping.

show abstract

Midrapidityφproduction in Au+Au collisions atsNN=130GeV

Cited by 92 publications

References 34 publications

Thermodynamically anomalous regions and possible new signals of mixed-phase formation

Thermodynamically anomalous regions and possible new signals of mixed-phase formation

Novel scheme for parametrizing the chemical freeze-out surface in heavy ion collision experiments

Systematics of chemical freeze-out parameters in heavy-ion collision experiments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About