2020
DOI: 10.1515/zaw-2020-3004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Middle and Passive Voice: Semantic Distinctions of the Niphal in Biblical Hebrew

Abstract: Scholars struggle to delineate the differences between the middle and passive voice. This is particularly apparent in scholarship on the Niphal (Biblical Hebrew). Using recent linguistic research (Ágel 2017; 2007), this article attempts to assist Hebraists and exegetes by distinguishing the passive and middle Niphal. Applying the concept of linguistic perspective, the categories of endoactive and exoactive predicates are illustrated on mlṭ and nṣl. In sum, this article demonstrates that linguistic perspective … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the root ngp is a stage 5 verb in both the qal (active voice, 9a) and the niphal (non-active voice, 9b). 23 In particular in the qal, where Yahweh is the subject, this is consistent 2019), to which may be added the response by Jones (2020). The point of discussion is to what extent the niphal expresses the passive and/or middle voice.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As can be seen, the root ngp is a stage 5 verb in both the qal (active voice, 9a) and the niphal (non-active voice, 9b). 23 In particular in the qal, where Yahweh is the subject, this is consistent 2019), to which may be added the response by Jones (2020). The point of discussion is to what extent the niphal expresses the passive and/or middle voice.…”
Section: Contextmentioning
confidence: 85%