2006
DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)32171-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mid-Trimester Genetic Amniocentesis in Twin Pregnancy and the Risk of Fetal Loss

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Pompe disease can be diagnosed prenatally by various methods (Fowler et al 2007;Hug et al 1984;Kishnani et al 2006b;Kleijer et al 1995;Phupong et al 2005), these invasive techniques may only be available in certain centres, and carry the risk of abortion, oligohydramnios, premature labour, and fetal loss (Millaire et al 2006;Odibo et al 2008). FE is a noninvasive and readily available method that can diagnose more than 90% of congenital heart defects (Allan 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although Pompe disease can be diagnosed prenatally by various methods (Fowler et al 2007;Hug et al 1984;Kishnani et al 2006b;Kleijer et al 1995;Phupong et al 2005), these invasive techniques may only be available in certain centres, and carry the risk of abortion, oligohydramnios, premature labour, and fetal loss (Millaire et al 2006;Odibo et al 2008). FE is a noninvasive and readily available method that can diagnose more than 90% of congenital heart defects (Allan 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prenatal diagnosis of Pompe disease was reported through enzyme assay, mutation analysis, or electron microscopy of amniotic fluid cells or chorionic villus sample (Fowler et al 2007;Hug et al 1984;Kleijer et al 1995;Phupong et al 2005). However, these techniques are only available in certain centers, and carry the risk of fetal loss, especially in twin gestation (Millaire et al 2006;Odibo et al 2008). It is currently unknown whether initiating ERT at birth for prenatally diagnosed infants would alter the long-term outcome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very similar estimate was, however, reported by Cahill et al [24] in a series of 311 amniocenteses in twin pregnancies. A meta-analysis of 2,026 women with twin pregnancies having amniocentesis concluded that the risk of fetal loss was significantly increased, with an OR of 2.42 (95% CI 1.24-4.74) [27] .…”
Section: Multiple Pregnanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…46 A recent study calculated the risk of pregnancy loss before 24 weeks' gestation to be one in 64 or 1.6%. 20 When a twin pregnancy follows fetal reduction of a higher order multiple pregnancy, amniocentesis does not seem to carry a greater risk of pregnancy loss than exists in higher order multiple pregnancies that undergo fetal reduction but no amniocentesis (total loss rate 8.1 vs 12.5%; no statistical difference). 47,48 In a review of four studies with a total of 614 twin pregnancies undergoing CVS, the overall loss rate before 22 weeks was reported at 3.1%, with a total loss rate (up to delivery) of about 4.8%.…”
Section: Pregnancy or Fetal Loss Ratementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Millaire et al studied 45 monochorionic twin pregnancies who underwent amniocentesis for different reasons and found no fetal loses in these cases. 20 Cahill et al reported an almost 6 times higher loss rate for the monochorionic twins that underwent amniocentesis (26 cases) compared to monochorionic pregnancies that did not have an amniocentesis (295 cases). 21 However, the sample of mono chorionic twins that underwent amniocentesis and was included in the study was limited.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%