2017
DOI: 10.1038/nphys4150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microwave spectroscopy of spinful Andreev bound states in ballistic semiconductor Josephson junctions

Abstract: AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS D. J. v. W., A. P. and D. B. performed the experiments. B. v. H., J. I. V. and L. I. G. developed the theory to analyze the data. P. K. and J. N. contributed to the nanowire growth. D. J. v. W., A. P. and D. B. fabricated the samples. L. P. K. and A. G. designed and supervised the experiments. D. J. v. W.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

9
129
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(90 reference statements)
9
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Topological superconductors (TSCs) supporting Majorana modes have been shown to demonstrate a 4π-periodic Josephson effect 4-10 , which is doubled period compared to the conventional Josephson effect. This phenomenon, which is known as the fractional Josephson effect, has been observed in quite a few devices 11,12 including the quantum spin Hall edge 13,14 . At first this is quite counter-intuitive given that the Hamiltonian itself is 2π-periodic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topological superconductors (TSCs) supporting Majorana modes have been shown to demonstrate a 4π-periodic Josephson effect 4-10 , which is doubled period compared to the conventional Josephson effect. This phenomenon, which is known as the fractional Josephson effect, has been observed in quite a few devices 11,12 including the quantum spin Hall edge 13,14 . At first this is quite counter-intuitive given that the Hamiltonian itself is 2π-periodic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, direct observations of these Majorana modes in quantum wires are challenging because of their intrinsic weak charge coupling. Indirect observations based on spectroscopy or interferometric measurements in proximitized semiconductor nanowire devices [14][15][16][17][18] or hybrid superconducting-quantum interference devices [19] are still debated as the signals are hard to distinguish from the contributions of other processes like Andreev bound states and the Kondo effect [18,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So far, CQED has been limited by standard SIS JJs based on aluminum and its oxide to fields <10 mT, the critical field of bulk aluminum [9]. However, interesting applications such as coupling CQED devices to polarized electronspin ensembles serving as quantum memories [10] and using qubits as charge-parity detectors in Majorana based topological quantum computation [11,12] require fields of ∼0.5 T. In such fields, more fundamental effects, such as topological phase transitions [13] and degeneracy lifting of the Andreev bound states which underlie the Josephson effect [14][15][16][17], can be studied. Entering this important regime for CQED requires the use of field-compatible superconductors and nonstandard JJs [18][19][20][21][22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%