2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.03.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microvascular free tissue transfer in reconstruction of the lower limb

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 Despite improvements in microvascular instrumentation and increased experience, thrombotic difficulties are still encountered troublesome percentage of microvascular reconstructive procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Despite improvements in microvascular instrumentation and increased experience, thrombotic difficulties are still encountered troublesome percentage of microvascular reconstructive procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, free flaps transferred to the lower limb have a higher incidence of vascular complication and flap necrosis compared to free flaps to other parts including head and neck, or upper extremity. 6 The success rates for free flap transfers to the lower limb has been reported to be ranging from 88 to 93%. [7][8][9] The reasons for these results are suggested to be due to the high incidence of trauma and associated comorbid conditions, 9 such as age-related arteriosclerosis or diabetes mellitus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The selection of appropriate recipient vessels is an essential element for achieving successful treatment outcomes in the reconstruction of lower extremity defects using free flap. 9 The anterior tibial artery is more vulnerable to damage compared with the posterior tibial artery. It has therefore been reported that the posterior tibial artery would be more appropriate as a recipient vessel.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that venous thrombosis as a cause of flap compromise is far more common than arterial thrombosis [1]. This risk is reduced by sound microsurgical technique, avoiding tension on the flap pedicle and utilising vessels of a good calibre out of the zone of injury [2]. In order to reduce the chances of flap failure early detection and surgical re-exploration is warranted [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In experienced microsurgical units, acceptable flap failure rates are <2 % for elective reconstructions and up to 5 % [1] following trauma. Higher failure rates are more common in trauma cases where recipient vessels for microsurgery can be damaged due to the zone of injury [2,3]. It is well known that venous thrombosis as a cause of flap compromise is far more common than arterial thrombosis [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%