2001
DOI: 10.1128/aem.67.1.469-472.2001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microvariation Artifacts Introduced by PCR and Cloning of Closely Related 16S rRNA Gene Sequences

Abstract: A defined template mixture of seven closely related 16S-rDNA clones was used in a PCR-cloning experiment to assess and track sources of artifactual sequence variation in 16S rDNA clone libraries. At least 14% of the recovered clones contained aberrations. Artifact sources were polymerase errors, a mutational hot spot, and cloning of heteroduplexes and chimeras. These data may partially explain the high degree of microheterogeneity typical of sequence clusters detected in environmental clone libraries.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
139
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surplus alleles occurred in seven individuals (Table 1), but the number of sqs clades (Table 1, Figure 3) did not exceed the ploidy level. Given the high sequence similarity within the clades, these additional 'alleles' may be attributed to polymerase errors that were not identifiable as such (Speksnijder et al, 2001) or to a failure to decide which of several very similar sequences were recombinant within a sample, especially if the putative recombination point was close to one end of the sequence. The inclusion of sequences into the final alignment was done in a conservative way in order not to dismiss small, but real differences, which may be easily overlooked if alleles are inferred from consensus sequences of clones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surplus alleles occurred in seven individuals (Table 1), but the number of sqs clades (Table 1, Figure 3) did not exceed the ploidy level. Given the high sequence similarity within the clades, these additional 'alleles' may be attributed to polymerase errors that were not identifiable as such (Speksnijder et al, 2001) or to a failure to decide which of several very similar sequences were recombinant within a sample, especially if the putative recombination point was close to one end of the sequence. The inclusion of sequences into the final alignment was done in a conservative way in order not to dismiss small, but real differences, which may be easily overlooked if alleles are inferred from consensus sequences of clones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If these repetitive procedures confirmed the double signals in the reads, PCR products were cloned following the same protocol a s u s e d f o r t h e s e p a r a t i o n o f t h e n a t i v e a n d contaminating DNA fragments. The resulting clones were checked for errors, e.g., as those reported by Speksnijder et al (2001) and Acinas et al (2005), against the alignment of the approved direct sequences. Clones with unique nucleotides or gaps in the conservative sites were disregarded.…”
Section: Taxonomic Scopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several biases which may cause pitfalls in the interpretation of the DGGE patterns have been reported, like heteroduplex formation, amplification errors, the presence of multiple copies of 16S rRNA operons (Speksnijder et al, 2001;Wintzingerode et al, 1997), co-migration of different DNA fragments (Sekiguchi et al, 2001) and the presence of several melting domains in a DNA fragment (Kisand and Wikner, 2003). Nevertheless, some of these problems can be solved by the excision of the bands followed by reamplification and sequencing, as the identity of the organisms can be ascertained if the DNA fragment analysed is polymorphic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%