Polymastiidae Gray, 1867 is a worldwide distributed sponge family, which has a great significance for understanding of the demosponge deep phylogeny since the former order Hadromerida Topsent, 1894 has been recently split based on the molecular evidence and a new separate order has been established for the polymastiids. However, molecular data obtained from Polymastiidae so far are scarce, while the phylogenetic reconstruction based on morphology has faced a deficit of characters along with the vagueness of their states. The present study is a phylogenetic reconstruction of Polymastiidae based on novel data on two molecular markers, cytochrome oxidase subunit I and large subunit ribosomal DNA, obtained from a broad set of species. Monophyly of the family and nonmonophyly of four polymastiid genera are revealed, suggesting a high level of homoplasy of morphological characters, which are therefore not an appropriate base for the natural classification of Polymastiidae. Although the presented phylogenies cannot yet provide an alternative classification scheme, several strongly supported clades, which may be used as reference points in future classification, are recovered and three taxonomic actions are proposed: transfer of one species from Radiella to Polymastia Bowerbank, 1862; transfer of three species from Radiella Schmidt, 1870 to Spinularia Gray, 1867; and the consequent abandonment of Radiella.

Phylogeny of the sponge family Polymastiidae was reconstructed based on 25 morphological characters. Twenty-one polymastiid species and three suberitid species, Suberites domuncula as outgroup, Aaptos aaptos and A. papillata as sister groups, were included in the analyses. The reconstructions were done in PAUP* running heuristic search with the parsimony criterion. We analysed three possible evolutionary scenarios based on three alternative interpretations of the body plan of Quasillina brevis and Ridleia oviformis: first-Ridleia possesses aquiferous papillae whereas Quasillina lacks them, second-both genera lack papillae and third-the body in both genera is a single hyperdeveloped papilla. All three scenarios excluded the secondary loss of the papillae in the polymastiid evolution. Scenario 2 also excluded the secondary loss of the regular choanosomal skeleton, while scenario 1 assumed its loss in Ridleia and scenario 3 admitted its loss in both Ridleia and Quasillina. We prioritised scenario 2 due to its maximal parsimony and rescaled consistency index and subsequently favoured the clustering of Ridleia and Quasillina separately from the monophyletic polymastiid clade. In all three scenarios Pseudotrachya hystrix clustered separately from other polymastiids in agreement with the molecular evidence, and thus the exclusion of Pseudotrachya from Polymastiidae was proposed. The relationships between A. papillata, Tentorium semisuberites, Polymastia uberrima, the clade Weberella bursa ? Polymastia boletiformis and the main polymastiid clade were ambiguous. Meanwhile, all scenarios showed the non-monophyly of Polymastia and Aaptos. Our hypotheses should be tested by reconstructions based on larger taxon sampling of hadromerid species and larger sets of morphological and molecular characters before any ultimate taxonomic decisions are taken.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (

No abstract

Polymastiidae (Porifera: Demospongiae) of the Nordic and Siberian Seas are revised and compared with the related species of the North Atlantic based on the morphological data from the type and comparative material and the molecular data from fresh samples. Twenty species from six polymastiid genera are recorded. Two species, Polymastia svenseni from Western Norway and Spinularia njordi from the Norwegian Sea, are new to science. One species, Polymastia andrica, is new to the Nordic Seas and two species, Polymastia cf. bartletti and P. penicillus, are new to the Scandinavian Coast. Distribution of the polymastiids in the North Atlantic and Arctic is discussed and the allegedly wide distribution of Spinularia sarsii and S. spinularia is questioned.

The Antarctic deep-water fauna of Polymastiidae and Suberitidae is revised using recently collected material from the Weddell Sea. The former family appeared to be more abundant and diverse than the latter family in the studied area. Seven species within five polymastiid genera and three species within three suberitid genera are described. Relatively high sponge abundance at two stations deeper than 4700 m was mainly constituted by a polymastiid species Radiella Antarctica sp. nov. Previously, representatives of Radiella have never been found in the Antarctic. An eurybathic species, Polymastia invaginata, well known from the Antarctic and subantarctic, appeared to be especially abundant at less than 1000 m depth. Another eurybathic polymastiid species, Tentorium cf. semisuberites, known for its bipolar distribution, was the third abundant species at the depths between 1000–2600 m, with the highest density found at the deeper stations. Tentorium papillatum, endemic of the Southern Hemisphere, was registered only at a depth of about 1000 m. Other species studied were less abundant. Astrotylus astrotylus, the representative of the endemic Antarctic genus, was found exclusively deeper than 4500 m, often together with R. antarctica. Acanthopolymastia acanthoxa, the endemic deepwater Antarctic species, was registered at 3000 m. The discovery of suberitid Aaptos robustus sp. nov. at about 2300 m is the first signalization of Aaptos in the Antarctic and at such a considerable depth. The finding of Suberites topsenti deeper than 4700 m is also remarkable. In general the results achieved confirm the high degree of geographical endemism of the Antarctic deep-water sponge fauna and the eurybathic distribution of many Antarctic sponge species.