2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11661-013-1839-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of a New As-Hot-Rolled High-Strength DP Steel Subjected to Different Cooling Schedules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 compares the mechanical properties of the present samples with DP steels that have been conventionally processed. It can be seen that the UTS and YS of the studied DP steel are lower than those of hot rolled ones, while the total elongation is relatively higher [2,10,13,27,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. The product of UTS × total elongation is relatively lower than that of hot rolled ones, which suggests a lower toughness in the studied steel compared to the reference steels.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…18 compares the mechanical properties of the present samples with DP steels that have been conventionally processed. It can be seen that the UTS and YS of the studied DP steel are lower than those of hot rolled ones, while the total elongation is relatively higher [2,10,13,27,[33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. The product of UTS × total elongation is relatively lower than that of hot rolled ones, which suggests a lower toughness in the studied steel compared to the reference steels.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The M/A constituents was systematically studied by Misra and co-wokers. [19] During the slow cooling process, the undercooled austenite first transforms to ferrite and the untransformed austenite becomes C rich. When C-rich austenite is cooled to a temperature below M s , it is partially or totally transformed to martensite and forms M/A constituent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saai et al 14) proposed that the volume fraction and distribution of martensite in the soft ferrite phase is responsible for strain localization and fracture in DP steels. While the strengthening effect of hard phases, such as martensite in DP steels 15) and δ-ferrite in duplex stainless steels, 16) are extensively investigated, there are few studies on the interactions between α-ferrite and austenite during hot deformation, where α-ferrite is the softer phase and austenite is the harder.…”
Section: Correlation Of Strain Accommodation Factor With the State Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%