2013
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-013-1276-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure of heat-treated PAN nanofibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the temperature of 60 °C was evaluated, some fibers started to melt, as displayed in Figure (b). Therefore, bonding and crosslinking structures between the nanofibers were formed and gradually enhanced with increasing temperature . The PU–PCL nanofibers at 70 °C are shown in Figure (c); they exhibited a uniform fiber diameter, narrow pore size distribution, and rough surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…When the temperature of 60 °C was evaluated, some fibers started to melt, as displayed in Figure (b). Therefore, bonding and crosslinking structures between the nanofibers were formed and gradually enhanced with increasing temperature . The PU–PCL nanofibers at 70 °C are shown in Figure (c); they exhibited a uniform fiber diameter, narrow pore size distribution, and rough surface.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a result, crystallization of the fiber improved. [52][53][54] Herein, the temperature most probably affects the crystalline structure and pore size ( Figure 5) of the PAN membranes which may reduce the water permeability. It was found that water absorption rate decreased with an increased crystallinity of the polymer.…”
Section: Filtration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tensile stress elevated obviously from 6.3 to 14.8 MPa, and the Young's modulus enlarged from 125 to 268 MPa at the same time. The increased fiber diameter and formation of interfiber bonding played the key role in bearing more load . Although the tensile stress still increased when PVB content exceeded 20 wt%, the strain of the PVdF/PVB NFM cut down on the contrary.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased fiber diameter and formation of interfiber bonding played the key role in bearing more load. [22,23] Although the tensile stress still increased when PVB content exceeded 20 wt%, the strain of the PVdF/PVB NFM cut down on the con trary. This resulted from the fact that large physically bonded structure made the membranes become less flexible due to their interfused and entangled nanofibers.…”
Section: Mechanical Property Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%