2021
DOI: 10.15376/biores.16.3.5329-5340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure identification based on vessel pores feature extraction of high-value hardwood species

Abstract: Because of the diversity of vessel pores in different hardwood species, they are important for wood species identification. In this paper, a Micro CT was used to collect wood images. The experiment was based on six wood types, Pterocarpus macrocarpus, Pterocarpus erinaceus, Dalbergia latifolia, Dalbergia frutescens var. tomentosa, Pterocarpus indicus, and Pterocarpus soyauxii. One-thousand cross-sectional images of 2042 px × 1640 px were collected for each species. One pixel represents 1.95 µm of the real phys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The existing methods of wood recognition are mainly based on anatomy, genetic biology and chemotaxonomical analysis. Traditional anatomy identification is well-established and most frequently used, which distinguishes wood samples by comparing their macroscopic and microscopic anatomical features [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], but it cannot accurately discriminate wood samples at the species scale [ 11 , 12 ]. Although the genetic method of DNA barcoding has been demonstrated to be effective in wood recognition even at the species scale, its wide application is limited by some technological challenges concerning DNA extraction, barcode selection and reference database [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], whereas the chemotaxonomical analysis exhibits more flexibility and potential for efficient identification, which is mainly based on various qualitative and quantitative fingerprint information of wood samples or their extractives obtained by chemical characterization techniques involving mass spectrometry [ 3 ], fluorescence [ 16 , 17 ], nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [ 18 ], Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) [ 19 , 20 ] or a specific combination of some of the above [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existing methods of wood recognition are mainly based on anatomy, genetic biology and chemotaxonomical analysis. Traditional anatomy identification is well-established and most frequently used, which distinguishes wood samples by comparing their macroscopic and microscopic anatomical features [ 8 , 9 , 10 ], but it cannot accurately discriminate wood samples at the species scale [ 11 , 12 ]. Although the genetic method of DNA barcoding has been demonstrated to be effective in wood recognition even at the species scale, its wide application is limited by some technological challenges concerning DNA extraction, barcode selection and reference database [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], whereas the chemotaxonomical analysis exhibits more flexibility and potential for efficient identification, which is mainly based on various qualitative and quantitative fingerprint information of wood samples or their extractives obtained by chemical characterization techniques involving mass spectrometry [ 3 ], fluorescence [ 16 , 17 ], nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy [ 18 ], Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) [ 19 , 20 ] or a specific combination of some of the above [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%