2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2005.09.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructure and mechanical properties of microalloyed steel forgings manufactured from cross-wedge-rolled preforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the arm region ( Figures 5D and 5B), the microstructure also consists of ferrite and pearlite grains, but the amount of acicular ferrite apparently decreases, perhaps because the reduction of heat transfer rate and the strain increasing in this region (Silva et al, 2006). However, the ausforged products which presented acicular ferrite in the microstructure showed the highest mechanical properties (UTS and YS) among the forged products.…”
Section: A B C Dmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the arm region ( Figures 5D and 5B), the microstructure also consists of ferrite and pearlite grains, but the amount of acicular ferrite apparently decreases, perhaps because the reduction of heat transfer rate and the strain increasing in this region (Silva et al, 2006). However, the ausforged products which presented acicular ferrite in the microstructure showed the highest mechanical properties (UTS and YS) among the forged products.…”
Section: A B C Dmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, deformation in the nonrecrystallization region increases ferrite nucleation sites through pancaking of austenite grains and creation of deformation bands. In this way, a fine microstructure will be produced after transformation [4,5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the energy savings reasons attempts are made to utilize heat attained in the metal after deformation, utilizing direct cooling from deformation-end temperature as a cost-effective alternative to traditional water or oil quenching and subsequent tempering, which sometimes can also be replaced. The required combination of static tensile strength and impact strength properties, superior to those typically provided for these steels after QT treatment, are to be obtained here with TMP employing controlled cooling directly after forging, taking advantage of synergic combination of several strengthening mechanisms, such as austenite grain refinement, austenite transformation and producing fine precipitates, mostly carbides and carbonitrides, on subsequent cooling to control its products fractions and morphology [5,6,7,8]. Assumed energy savings are associated with eradication reheating prior to normalization and quenching as well as the use of blast air instead of cooling media and facilities associated which call for costly installations [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While TMP calls for a higher culture of managing the process, conventional forging processes are featured by scatter of forging temperature and serious gradients of temperature and strain in the bulk. In result, within-part and piece-to-piece inconsistency and repeatability problems occur, both in press and hammer forging [7,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%