2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.06.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microstructural development during the quenching and partitioning process in a newly designed low-carbon steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
104
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 275 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
104
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Increasing PT can accelerate the carbon partitioning from martensite to austenite (Santofimia et al, 2008). For example, it was reported in Santofimia et al (2011b), that for the same QT and Pt, the maximum RA volume fraction is reached at shorter times for higher PTs, i.e. carbon diffusion during partitioning is controlled more effectively by PT rather than Pt.…”
Section: Influence Of Ptmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Increasing PT can accelerate the carbon partitioning from martensite to austenite (Santofimia et al, 2008). For example, it was reported in Santofimia et al (2011b), that for the same QT and Pt, the maximum RA volume fraction is reached at shorter times for higher PTs, i.e. carbon diffusion during partitioning is controlled more effectively by PT rather than Pt.…”
Section: Influence Of Ptmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, after yielding the amount of UM, which contributes to the material's strength, is increased. This martensite will be different to that previously formed as it will normally be expected to inherit a higher carbon concentration (Edmonds et al, 2006;Santofimia et al, 2011b). For this reason, the σ UTS value for the 244-350-500 sample might be the highest one.…”
Section: Influence Of Qtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further evidence that the change in lattice parameter is the result of carbon partitioning is supported by literature reports that nickel decreases the austenite lattice parameter. [2][3][4] Nickel is an austenite stabilizer, thus it would tend to partition into austenite (not out of it). Therefore, nickel partitioning into austenite cannot be used to explain the increase in the lattice parameter of austenite.…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The austenite lattice parameter for each sample was calculated based on the positions of the {220}γ and {311}γ peaks. The carbon content of the austenite was estimated using the expression given by Santofimia et al 3) which combines data from van Dijk et al 4) and Dyson and Holmes, 5) and goes as:…”
Section: X-ray Diffraction (Xrd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because measured dilatometric expansions at low partitioning temperatures during Q&P may signify low interface mobility and little migration, bainitic growth, and/or isothermal martensite formation (below M s ), whereas dilatometric contractions at higher partitioning temperatures may correspond to reduced ferrite growth, austenite growth, and/or martensite tempering effects. 14,24,[27][28][29][30][31] Electron backscatter diffraction of Q&P microstructures has revealed mobile austenite/martensite interfaces that migrate toward martensite in a high Mn steel and stationary interfaces in a high Ni steel (containing plate martensite), 24 suggesting that martensite morphology may influence the partitioning behaviours. Local chemistry variations, such as Mn enrichment in the austenite near the austenite/martensite interface, are also possible after Q&P. 22 Tempering of a maraging TRIP steel at 450uC for 48 h has been found to result in Mn diffusion to the austenite and growth of a new austenite layer adjacent to the existing austenite, 32 which could presumably affect mechanical properties.…”
Section: Austenite/martensite Interfacial Migration and Martensite Tementioning
confidence: 99%