“…Experimental and theoretical studies have proposed that olivine CPO is a function of differential stress and water content (e.g., Jung et al, 2006;Jung & Karato, 2001;Katayama et al, 2004), as well as other parameters such as melt content (e.g., Holtzman et al, 2003;Qi et al, 2018), confining pressure (e.g., Mainprice et al, 2005), temperature (e.g., , preexisting CPO (e.g., Boneh & Skemer, 2014;, and deformation kinematics (e.g., Tommasi et al, 1999). At the low differential stresses (~10 MPa) inferred for flow in the uppermost mantle (e.g., Behr & Hirth, 2014;Chin et al, 2016;Hansen & Warren, 2015), a water-induced transition between texture types is predicted by simple shear experiments at a few hundred ppm H/Si in olivine (e.g., Jung et al, 2006;Katayama et al, 2004), from an A-type texture to an E-type texture associated with slip in the [100] direction on the (001) plane ( Figure 1). However, recent studies by Bernard and Behr (2017) and Bernard et al (2019) on continental mantle xenoliths revealed no discernable relationship between water concentration and these CPO types.…”