“…First, limitations of DTI should be recognized; complex white matter fiber configurations and diverse intra‐voxel tissue organization (e.g., partial volume effects) are known to affect the accuracy of DTI measurements (Alexander et al., 2001; Tuch et al., 2002; Vos et al., 2011; Wiegell et al., 2000), precluding definitive conclusions of the potential for the collar to modulate and preserve these metrics. Future research should consider incorporating other diffusion MRI approaches with more novel and specific sequences (e.g., HARDI, Edlow & Wu, 2013) and complementary analytic techniques (e.g., neurite orientation and dispersion density imaging, Zhang, Schneider, Wheeler‐Kingshott, & Alexander, 2012), quantifying superficial (i.e., short association or “U” fibers) rather than primarily deep (e.g., long association fibers, commissural fibers) white matter (Stojanovski et al., 2019), and measures of structural connectivity (Xiao, Yang, Xi, & Chen, 2015) and/or graph theory (Bullmore & Sporns, 2009). Another limitation of DTI is that it fails to measure cerebral blood flow—which is affected by repetitive, sub‐concussive head impacts (Slobounov et al., 2017) and potentially modulated by JVC—warranting future multimodal MRI approaches to supplement the present DTI findings (e.g., arterial spin labeling, Koretsky, 2012).…”