Microservices approach for the internet of things

Butzin, Björn; Golatowski, Frank; Timmermann, Dirk

doi:10.1109/etfa.2016.7733707

Cited by 163 publications

(84 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…So far, research has focused more on performance and maintainability issues than on reliability . As for the latter, the general trend is to exploit microservices' features like loose coupling to increase failure detection, fault tolerance or availability in MSAs (e.g., ). To the best of our knowledge, the assessment of operational reliability of MSAs is not addressed yet.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testing microservice architectures for operational reliability

Pietrantuono

Russo

Guerriero

2019

Software Testing Verif & Rel

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Summary Microservice architectures (MSA) is an emerging software architectural paradigm for service‐oriented applications, well‐suited for dynamic contexts requiring loosely coupled independent services, frequent software releases and decentralized governance. A key problem in the engineering of MSA applications is the estimate of their reliability, which is difficult to perform prior to release due frequent releases/service upgrades, dynamic service interactions, and changes in the way customers use the applications. This paper presents an in vivo testing method, named EMART, to faithfully assess the reliability of an MSA application in operation. EMART is based on an adaptive sampling strategy, leveraging monitoring data about microservices usage and failure/success of user demands. We present results of evaluation of estimation accuracy, confidence and efficiency, through a set of controlled experiments with publicly available subjects. © 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Testing microservice architectures for operational reliability

Pietrantuono

Russo

Guerriero

2019

Software Testing Verif & Rel

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This platform uses some of the principles that define a serverless architecture. Moreover, the authors in this paper are focused on the time constraints and the effect of the delays between microservices on the platform behaviour [4] describes in detail the process and the advantages of using this kind of architectures for an Internet of Things application. Finally, [5] characterizes the implementation of microservices for critical applications in which the sensitive data is handled, integrity and confidentiality are key points.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Serverless Cloud Computing : A Comparison Between "Function as a Service" Platforms

Jiménez¹,

Zeiner²

2018

Computer Science &Amp; Information Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…) for All in do (iterate Microservice instance being used) (7) for All ∈ do (check CVO and VOs used by the Services) (8) if O == output of C in a relationship set R then (9) add C to Ç (10) else (11) if O == output of V in relationship set R V then (12) add V to Ç (13) N ← tag (Assign relationship tag to each object entry) (14) else (15) add O to Ç (16) end if (17) end if (18) …”

Section: Social Relationship Discovery and Compositionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This way, the SPARQL queries are executed; the first query is denoted as to retrieve the available service templates and the second query is represented as to extract the relationships associated with the services. From line (5) to (11), first, the social relationship is searched among objects and then the found relative objects are composed in groups. The design philosophy employed over here is to assign a ranking to each selected group based on the relationship type that helps in a more efficient composition of service objects (from line (12) to (18)).…”

Section: Require: (Aec) (R ) (Z)mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To support the above-mentioned use cases, most of the current IoT architectural approaches are not suitable as they are based on the traditional monolithic approaches, which further hinder the development of efficient, modular, and independent services that cannot scale well with the increasing user's service demands, as already witnessed in many studies [9][10][11][12]. Using monolithic approaches, we cannot fully achieve the benefits offered by SIoT including efficient information discovery, improved scalability, and simplified interconnection of objects.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Model of Socially Connected Web Objects for IoT Applications

Ali

Kibria

Jarwar

et al. 2018

Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Internet of Things (IoT) is evolving with the connected objects at an unprecedented rate, bringing about enormous opportunities for the future IoT applications as well as challenges. One of the major challenges is to handle the complexity generated by the interconnection of billions of objects. However, Social Internet of Things (SIoT), emerging from the conglomeration of IoT and social networks, has realized an efficient way to facilitate the development of complex future IoT applications. Nevertheless, to fully utilize the benefits of SIoT, a platform that can provide efficient services using social relations among heterogeneous objects is highly required. The web objects enabled IoT environment promotes SIoT features by enabling virtualization using virtual objects and supporting the modularity with microservices. To realize SIoT services, this article proposes an architecture that provides a foundation for the development of lightweight microservices based on socially connected web objects. To efficiently discover web objects and reduce the complexity of service provisioning processes, a social relationship model is presented. To realize the interoperable service operations, a semantic ontology model has been developed. Finally, to evaluate the proposed design, a prototype has been implemented based on a use case scenario.

show abstract

Microservices approach for the internet of things

Cited by 163 publications

References 7 publications

Testing microservice architectures for operational reliability

Testing microservice architectures for operational reliability

Serverless Cloud Computing : A Comparison Between "Function as a Service" Platforms

A Model of Socially Connected Web Objects for IoT Applications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About