2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2005.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic theory of dissipation for slowly time-dependent mean field potentials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More generally, theoretical studies on surface motion of a cavity wall [18,187,188,189], among which multipole vibrations and fission are, suggest that the original wall damping mechanism [16] overestimates the dissipation rate in nuclear matter. That is understood by chaotic singleparticle motion and quantal effects, which violate the original assumption of full randomisation [190]. This deficiency in the early derivation of the one-body theory partly contributes to the variety of contradicting conclusions on nuclear dissipation [191].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, theoretical studies on surface motion of a cavity wall [18,187,188,189], among which multipole vibrations and fission are, suggest that the original wall damping mechanism [16] overestimates the dissipation rate in nuclear matter. That is understood by chaotic singleparticle motion and quantal effects, which violate the original assumption of full randomisation [190]. This deficiency in the early derivation of the one-body theory partly contributes to the variety of contradicting conclusions on nuclear dissipation [191].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let t 0 represent the collision time: t 0 ∼ r 0 /v F , where r 0 is the range of the effective force and v F is the Fermi velocity. Then, following [49,34], we postulate that for |t| > t 0…”
Section: Frictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Turning to microscopic expressions for friction γ, we remark that for quite a long time [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34] they were extracted from the linear response function of a thermally equilibrated Fermi gas confined by the external forces on the small variations of those forces. And only recently [35] it has been realized that in the bulk of such a gas, there will be no mass flow, j x , defined as the expectation of the momentum density operator…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the hydrodynamic formula for M does not imply with necessity that the mean free path of the nucleon is small compared to the nuclear size. Turning to microscopic expressions for friction γ , we note that for more than three decades [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] they were extracted from the linear response function of thermally equilibrated Fermi gas enclosed in a cavity on slow variations of the shape of the cavity. And only recently [40] it has been realized that in the bulk of such a gas, there is no mass flow, j x , defined as the expectancy of the momentum density operator p x .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In[39] we use the t 0 − t 3 version of the Skyrme force to obtain the semiclassical expression for Γ 1 in finite spherical nuclei and compare it to the values of Γ 1 in infinite matter.The smallness of the collision time τ 0 compared to the mean free path time ∼ Γ −1 , allows to use the asymptotic form (151), (152) for all t in (150), givingγ = im 2 νλ |φ λν | 2 f λfν ∞ −∞ t dt e −η|t| d4 dt 4 e −Γ λν |t| e −iE λν t ,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%