2011
DOI: 10.1002/jemt.21079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microscopic study of certain age‐related structural changes of maxillary sinus lining epithelium in albino rats

Abstract: Mucociliary clearance is essential to maintain the defense function of the maxillary sinus; however, no literatures described the age changes in its lining epithelium. Therefore, the current work sought to describe the morphological postnatal age-related changes of maxillary sinus lining epithelium in rats using light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopes. Eighteen albino rats were divided into six groups according to their ages: 2-week-old, 1-month-old, 2-month-old, 3-month-old, adults, and senile … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is known that there is a higher prevalence of bacterial rhinosinusitis and that its recurrence in hematopoietic stem cell-transplanted patients is still 4.3 times more likely in those with chronic GVHD [6,[16][17][18]. Given our previous results, it was found that patients undergoing HSCT had significant epithelial damage after the transplants, which may increase the risk of respiratory infection via the mechanical disruption of the barrier protection [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…It is known that there is a higher prevalence of bacterial rhinosinusitis and that its recurrence in hematopoietic stem cell-transplanted patients is still 4.3 times more likely in those with chronic GVHD [6,[16][17][18]. Given our previous results, it was found that patients undergoing HSCT had significant epithelial damage after the transplants, which may increase the risk of respiratory infection via the mechanical disruption of the barrier protection [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%