2022
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6382/ac49f6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MICROSCOPE: systematic errors

Abstract: The MICROSCOPE mission aims to test the Weak Equivalence Principle (WEP) in orbit with an unprecendented precision of 10-15 on the Eövös parameter thanks to electrostatic accelerometers on board a drag-free microsatellite. The precision of the test is determined by statistical errors, due to the environment and instrument noises, and by systematic errors to which this paper is devoted. Sytematic error sources can be divided into three categories: external perturbations, such as the residual atmospheric drag or… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
79
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The EP limits come from torsion balance experiments described in Section V E [451,452,673] and the MICROSCOPE satellite [30,42,454]. MICROSCOPE aims to tests the EP in orbit to an ultimate precision of 10 −15 using electrostatic accelerometers on board a drag-free microsatellite [674], with current results based on a fraction of their data [42,454]. Torsion balance experiments that are up to a factor of 10 more sensitive are in preparation at the University of Washington.…”
Section: Combined Exclusion Plots and Projections For Future Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EP limits come from torsion balance experiments described in Section V E [451,452,673] and the MICROSCOPE satellite [30,42,454]. MICROSCOPE aims to tests the EP in orbit to an ultimate precision of 10 −15 using electrostatic accelerometers on board a drag-free microsatellite [674], with current results based on a fraction of their data [42,454]. Torsion balance experiments that are up to a factor of 10 more sensitive are in preparation at the University of Washington.…”
Section: Combined Exclusion Plots and Projections For Future Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the calibration of the instrument detailed in Ref. [15] (scale factor, alignment, non-linearities, thermal sensitivities) as well as the evaluation of its stability over time were regularly performed in order to optimise the science output of the mission. These calibration sessions were regularly performed before or after EP test sessions.…”
Section: Implemented Scenariomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calibration method is detailed in Ref. [15]. It consists of applying a reference signal at f cal in the DFACS loop for all "CAL" type sessions.…”
Section: N2 Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations