2005
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0506482102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MicroRNAs control translation initiation by inhibiting eukaryotic initiation factor 4E/cap and poly(A) tail function

Abstract: MicroRNAs (miRNAs) repress translation of target mRNAs by interaction with partially mismatched sequences in their 3 UTR. The mechanism by which they act on translation has remained largely obscure. We examined the translation of mRNAs containing four partially mismatched miRNA-binding sites in the 3 UTR in HeLa cells cotransfected with a cognate miRNA. The mRNAs were prepared by in vitro transcription and were engineered to employ different modes of translation initiation. We find that the 5 cap structure and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

22
416
2
10

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 561 publications
(450 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
22
416
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Plant miRNAs are also methylated on the ribose of the last nucleotide, a modification presumably involved in protecting miRNAs from 3′ end uridylation and degradation, whereas animal miRNAs do not appear to be modified Yu et al 2005). Mechanistically, most animal miRNAs are only partly complementary to their targets and mediate silencing primarily by translational repression, although localization to the processing bodies may also affect RNA stability (Humphreys et al 2005;Liu et al 2005b;Pillai et al 2005;Wienholds and Plasterk 2005;Zamore and Haley 2005). In contrast, most plant miRNAs have near-perfect complementarity to their targets and trigger predominantly mRNA cleavage (Carrington and Ambros 2003;Schwab et al 2005).…”
Section: Additional (Derived?) Functions Of the Rnai Machinerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Plant miRNAs are also methylated on the ribose of the last nucleotide, a modification presumably involved in protecting miRNAs from 3′ end uridylation and degradation, whereas animal miRNAs do not appear to be modified Yu et al 2005). Mechanistically, most animal miRNAs are only partly complementary to their targets and mediate silencing primarily by translational repression, although localization to the processing bodies may also affect RNA stability (Humphreys et al 2005;Liu et al 2005b;Pillai et al 2005;Wienholds and Plasterk 2005;Zamore and Haley 2005). In contrast, most plant miRNAs have near-perfect complementarity to their targets and trigger predominantly mRNA cleavage (Carrington and Ambros 2003;Schwab et al 2005).…”
Section: Additional (Derived?) Functions Of the Rnai Machinerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This pairing may either lead to mRNA degradation, or can affect the efficiency of translation by either promoting the ribosomal drop-off from the mRNA, or inhibiting the formation of 80S ribosome at the beginning of the translation (Humphreys et al 2005;Pillai et al 2005;Nottrott et al 2006;Petersen et al 2006). It was shown that miRNAs can also affect the stability of mRNA by de-adenylation and de-capping of the target mRNA (BehmAnsmant et al 2006;Giraldez et al 2006;Mishima et al 2006;Wu et al 2006).…”
Section: How Are Mirnas Produced?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This so called 'seed sequence' [29][30][31] has been used to attempt the bioinformatic matching of miRNAs and gene targets, however, as the sequence nucleotide constraints for other parts of the miRNA-target interaction are much weaker and are much less well defined this has proven to be difficult [10,32]. The role of miRNAs in the regulation of gene expression is primarily thought to be through repression of translation, however, there is conflicting evidence as to whether miRNA activity is mediated through effects on the initiation of translation and/or termination [33][34][35].…”
Section: Microrna Biogenesis and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%