2014
DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2133-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MicroRNAs as novel biomarkers for pancreatic cancer diagnosis: a meta-analysis based on 18 articles

Abstract: Dysregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) have been reported to be associated with pancreatic cancer (PaC), suggesting that they may serve as useful novel diagnostic biomarkers for PaC. Various studies have been performed to investigate the diagnostic value of miRNAs for PaC but have obtained conflicting results. Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to comprehensively and quantitatively evaluate the potential diagnostic value of miRNAs for PaC. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When stratified by sample types, the results indicate that comparing to urine-based assays, blood-based assays could be a better choice as a diagnostic tool. Ding et al carried out a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of miRNAs for pancreatic cancer and made a similar observation that blood-based assays were significantly better than non-blood-based assays [ 37 ]. However, Wei et al performed a meta-analysis to measure the diagnostic value of miRNAs for cancers of the central nervous system and found that cerebrospinal fluid-based assays had more precise results than blood-based assays [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When stratified by sample types, the results indicate that comparing to urine-based assays, blood-based assays could be a better choice as a diagnostic tool. Ding et al carried out a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of miRNAs for pancreatic cancer and made a similar observation that blood-based assays were significantly better than non-blood-based assays [ 37 ]. However, Wei et al performed a meta-analysis to measure the diagnostic value of miRNAs for cancers of the central nervous system and found that cerebrospinal fluid-based assays had more precise results than blood-based assays [ 38 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it was observed only in few samples, therefore, further validation of miR-196a and -196b should be carried out to test their utility in PC diagnosis [230]. A meta-analysis study was carried out on 18 articles with a total of 2,036 patients and 1,444 controls to determine the role miRNAs in early diagnosis and reported that pooled sensitivity of 82 % (95 % CI, 78–86 %); and specificity of 77 % (95 % CI, 73–81 %) with AUC of 0.86 (95 % CI, 0.83–0.89), suggesting the potential diagnostic value of miRNAs (inclusion of multiple miRNAs for diagnosis) to discriminate PC patients from healthy controls with high sensitivity and specificity [231]. …”
Section: Potential Role Of Mirnas In Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, tumor‐suppressive miRNAs are often downregulated in a range of cancers , whereas oncogenic miRNAs are upregulated . Some miRNAs are dysregulated in pancreatic cancer and function as novel biomarkers for diagnosis and potential therapeutic targets . However, the roles of miR‐410 in tumorigenesis of pancreatic cancer remain poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%