2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microplastic pollution in sublittoral coastal sediments of a North Atlantic island: The case of La Palma (Canary Islands, Spain)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…na, not available. The most abundant microplastic type in our study was microfibres (representing 76.77%), which is in line with previously reported environmental microplastic concentrations in subtidal sediments [84], in open ocean subsurface water [85] and marine biota intestinal contents [83], including studies on the Portuguese coast [86][87][88]. Particularly, our result is also in line with other studies analysing ingestion of microplastics by cetaceans and other marine top predators, such as seabirds and sea turtles [19,48,50,51,68,82,83,89].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…na, not available. The most abundant microplastic type in our study was microfibres (representing 76.77%), which is in line with previously reported environmental microplastic concentrations in subtidal sediments [84], in open ocean subsurface water [85] and marine biota intestinal contents [83], including studies on the Portuguese coast [86][87][88]. Particularly, our result is also in line with other studies analysing ingestion of microplastics by cetaceans and other marine top predators, such as seabirds and sea turtles [19,48,50,51,68,82,83,89].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The low abundance of MPs recorded at the majority of sites would indicate that none of these are accumulation areas and may reflect recent deposition, may be indicative of underwater activity in the area, and their distance to terrestrial sources. Canensi et al 46 and Villanova-Solano et al 51 similarly found no relationship between water depth and the density of MPs.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The study area includes surface sediments, which generally become finer with increasing water depth and consist of clayey sands overlying silty clays, which are often simply classified as mud or deep sea mud. , Except for the very fine sand-dominated sediment on the continental shelf, most sediment was found to be poorly to very poorly sorted indicative of a low energy muddy area . Villanova-Solano et al found an increased abundance of MPs with moderately sorted sediment as opposed to poorly sorted in the shallow coastal sediments in La Palma, Canary Islands. Vermeiren et al state that MP abundance decreases exponentially with increasing sediment grain size on sandy shores, while Marques Mendes et al indicate that both distribution and abundance of MPs in coastal sediments depends on grain size and distance from sources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abundance of MPs in sediment ranged from 5.7 to 24.7 items/30 g dw (relevant to 190~823 items/kg dw). The abundance of MPs observed in the present study was much higher than that found in the south of the Caspian Sea, reaching 0-48 items/kg dw [53], and in the Bay of Bengal of India, reaching 0.33-317.67 items/kg, but it was comparatively lower than that found in lake shore sediment of the Montenegrin Coast of the Adriatic Sea basin (150-2500 items/kg dw) [54] and in coastal sediment of La Palma in Spain (2682 ± 827 items/kg dw) [55]. Overall, the pollution status of the MPs in the Daya Bay was in the middle level.…”
Section: Characteristics Of Microplastics Of Daya Baymentioning
confidence: 74%