2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-015-3539-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microorganisms responsible for periprosthetic knee infections in England and Wales

Abstract: IV.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…34 Linkage of the National Joint Registry data to microbiology data could reduce a posteriori any misdiagnoses of prosthetic joint infection, but has been shown to be of limited generalisability, with only 11•8% linkage achievable. 35 The associations that we have identified might vary with different causative pathogens, but unfortunately we do not have the data to explore this concept. Our findings should be considered as conservative estimates of the risk factors with the strongest effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…34 Linkage of the National Joint Registry data to microbiology data could reduce a posteriori any misdiagnoses of prosthetic joint infection, but has been shown to be of limited generalisability, with only 11•8% linkage achievable. 35 The associations that we have identified might vary with different causative pathogens, but unfortunately we do not have the data to explore this concept. Our findings should be considered as conservative estimates of the risk factors with the strongest effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Laboratory data were collected through PHE's 'second generation laboratory surveillance system' (SGSS) which collates information on confirmed pathogens from national and regional laboratories in England [17]. Anonymised laboratory data were collated between period 30 September 2013 to 19 July 2015, (week 40 in 2013 to week 29 in 2015), as weekly counts of respiratory pathogens by specimen date.…”
Section: Laboratory Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The implanted biomaterial must possess broadspectrum antibacterial performance as a wide variety of bacteria can infect an implant, including Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. 39 The implant also needs to exhibit excellent biological properties to promote osseointegration at the bone-implant interface, thereby limiting the chances of infection leading to osteolysis and implant loosening. 34,40 In the present study, we have successfully fabricated Znsurface-modied Ti substrates via PDA chemical surface modication to achieve both excellent biological and antibacterial performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%