2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical modeling of the progressive failure in short glass–fiber reinforced thermoplastics – First Pseudo-Grain Damage model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accurate description of the SCFR-PEEK mechanical impact behavior needs to take into account the preferential alignment of fibers in the injection molding direction, IFD [8,33]. The results of experimental testing in this study (Fig.…”
Section: Modelling Behavior Of Peek Compositementioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accurate description of the SCFR-PEEK mechanical impact behavior needs to take into account the preferential alignment of fibers in the injection molding direction, IFD [8,33]. The results of experimental testing in this study (Fig.…”
Section: Modelling Behavior Of Peek Compositementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Experimental observations of some authors have shown no significant influence on mechanical properties of short fiber reinforced thermoplastic composite under low strain rates demonstrating elasto-plastic behavior [14]. For high strain rates experimental stress-strain curves showed an elasto-viscoplastic behavior although this dependence is neglectable for temperatures near to glass transition [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The main problem of such a material is that the microstructure can be really complex, and, to our knowledge there are not so many homogenization methods available to describe such a microstructure. Previous papers usually use the Mori Tanaka estimates (Kammoun et al 2015, Despringre et al 2016 but, as we will see in the section 2.2.3 of this paper, it may give too compliant estimates. To handle this, we use a full field method based on Fast Fourier Transforms Suquet 1994, Moulinec andSuquet 1998) which has the advantage of being meshless (unlike the finite elements methods) thus evading meshing problems (or tremendous amount of calculation time to avoid the latter).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These methods integrate directly the effects of the microstructure parameters and the constitutive law of each constituent in the estimated law of the composite. This can be achieved in an analytical way in the case of mean field methods (Kammoun et al 2015, Despringre et al 2016 or given as a result of numerical simulations in the case of full field methods (Moulinec and Suquet 1994, Moulinec and Suquet 1998, Dirrenberger et al 2014. In the case of linear viscoelasticity, by using the correspondence principle, (Lévesque et al 2007, Ricaud andMasson 2009), authors find some estimates in closed form for the macroscopic laws of isotropic composites with microstructures following the Hashin Shtrikman lower bound.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate evaluation of mechanical performance and durability of structural moldings requires consideration of process‐induced anisotropy and the possible existence of micrometric porosity. In this context, integrative simulation chains (ISC) are developed to integrate forming process in finite element computations . However, quantitative estimation of mechanical properties is still inaccurate particularly in areas where microstructure heterogeneities are the least predictable such as weld lines .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%