2015
DOI: 10.1002/pc.23596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical modeling of large deformation in sepiolite reinforced rubber sealing composites under transverse tension

Abstract: This article presents an experimental and numerical study on mechanical behavior of sepiolite reinforced rubber sealing composites (SRRC), which are subjected to the transverse tensile loads. A finite element model of composites with fibers in square and random distribution is adopted for the numerical study. The representative volume elements with different fiber volume fraction are established and analyzed. A successive remeshing strategy is employed to achieve the large deformation of SRRC. The results show… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Periodic boundary conditions are applied to the RVEs by coupling the opposite nodes on the opposite boundary surfaces. On the boundary surface, there is ui=trueɛ¯ikxk+ui where, trueɛ¯ik are the average strains, ui are the periodic part of the displacement components on the boundary surfaces and it is generally unknown and is dependent on the applied loads, x k are the local of the boundary face.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Periodic boundary conditions are applied to the RVEs by coupling the opposite nodes on the opposite boundary surfaces. On the boundary surface, there is ui=trueɛ¯ikxk+ui where, trueɛ¯ik are the average strains, ui are the periodic part of the displacement components on the boundary surfaces and it is generally unknown and is dependent on the applied loads, x k are the local of the boundary face.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rubber matrix was modeled as an incompressible Mooney‐Rivlin hyperelastic solid , and the strain energy density U of the rubber matrix took the form as U=C10true(I13true)+C01true(I23true) I1=λ12+λ22+λ32, I2=λ12+λ22+λ32 where λ i ( i = 1,2,3) are principal stretches. C 10 and C 10 are the material constants of Mooney‐Rivlin constitutive model.…”
Section: Computational Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AH is also used to predict the effective properties of composites under finite strains [7][8][9][10][11]. Due to the nonlinearity of the problem of mechanics at finite deformations [12][13][14][15], the AH method encounters certain difficulties in implementation. The complexity of this method is justified by the possibility of obtaining a more accurate approximation of the desired solution compared to the theory using only effective properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%