2007
DOI: 10.1007/s00542-007-0408-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Micromechanical characterization of electroplated permalloy films for MEMS

Abstract: In order to improve the reliability of MEMS designs, evaluating the mechanical properties of soft magnetic materials is needed. In this paper, we present a tensile testing method to characterize the mechanical properties of microscale electroplated permalloy (80 wt% Ni, 20 wt% Fe) films. The gauge section of the specimen is 50 lm wide, 100 lm long and 5 lm thick. The measured Young's modulus of permalloy films is 96.4 GPa, and the tensile strength is 1.61 GPa. The fracture strain measured by the images of spec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly, although the hardness values of nanocrystalline Cu–Ni are slightly lower than for Si, the latter exhibits a Young's modulus of 130 GPa,7 hence lower than for the metallic films investigated here. In turn, the measured Young's modulus of permalloy (96.4 GPa)—one of the typical alloys used for soft magnetic MEMS—is also much lower than for Cu–Ni 10. If one assumes a Poisson's ratio for Cu–Ni of 0.34,48 the real Young's modulus of the Cu 1– x Ni x nanocrystalline films would vary between 180.2 and 204 GPa for x = 0.45 and 0.87, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly, although the hardness values of nanocrystalline Cu–Ni are slightly lower than for Si, the latter exhibits a Young's modulus of 130 GPa,7 hence lower than for the metallic films investigated here. In turn, the measured Young's modulus of permalloy (96.4 GPa)—one of the typical alloys used for soft magnetic MEMS—is also much lower than for Cu–Ni 10. If one assumes a Poisson's ratio for Cu–Ni of 0.34,48 the real Young's modulus of the Cu 1– x Ni x nanocrystalline films would vary between 180.2 and 204 GPa for x = 0.45 and 0.87, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From a magnetic point of view, pure Ni, Ni 19 Fe 81 (permalloy) and CoFe‐based alloys have received attention due to their soft magnetic character 9. However, some of their mechanical properties (e.g., hardness in fine‐grained Ni or Young's modulus in Ni 19 Fe 81 thin films) are worse than those of silicon 10, 11. Most of these detrimental issues could be overcome by advanced routes to nc‐metallic thin films that combine ferromagnetic behavior with good mechanical properties and low surface roughness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using these values, we have estimated the compressive strains in the deposition direction as ε P = (9 ± 3) ‰ and ε T = (7 ± 2) ‰. To calculate the strain, the equation for the magnetostrictive anisotropy K = 3/2 λε Y is applied, with the magnetostriction constant λ = 5 × 10 −6 and the Young's modulus Y = 100 GPa for electroplated Py . Interestingly, the coercive field of the rolled‐up nanomembrane measured in the easy‐axis direction, H C,T = (6.1 ± 0.2) kA m –1 , was found to be smaller than that of the reference planar film, H C,P = (10.0 ± 0.2) kA m –1 .…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Xin Zing et al [22] introduced another variant of microrotating sensor with improved sensitivity though notches. In particular, when the magnitude of the residual stress was small, the micro-rotating structures could still make the measurement with a high accuracy of ±1 MPa [22,23]. Another approach [24] uses a load lever, a pair of torsion bars, supported by a 15×15mm frame and is based upon a two-step bulk micromachining process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%