Microleakage along Glassix glass fibre posts cemented with three different materials assessed using a fluid transport system

Rogić-Barbić, Marija; Šegović, Sanja; Pezelj-Ribarić, Sonja; Borčić, Josipa; Jukić, Silvana; Anić, Ivica

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01071.x

Cited by 9 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Works using dyes, although showing limitations, have still been used to verify the capacity of cementing agents [29,30]. The literature shows that the cementing of pins with zinc phosphate cement has higher apical contamination rates [31,32], which was confirmed in this study during the daily control, since all the specimens were infected within 29 days. The results of this study showed no significant difference in relation to bacterial infiltration, when glass ionomer and resin cements were compared.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

Evaluation of Apical Contamination in Teeth with Prefabricated Posts Fixed with Different Dental Cements

Machado¹,

Alvarez-Leite²,

Seraidarian³

et al. 2015

Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To assess the sealing capacity of different dental cements regarding apical microleakage on teeth with prefabricated posts. Material and Methods: Forty-eight single-rooted teeth were selected and, after having their coronal part removed at 10mm standard, underwent endodontic cleaning and preparation. The space for the post was prepared with # 3 Largo bur at 7 mm standard value. The study included the following groups: Group I, post prefabricated with # 1 intracanal glass fiber cemented with zinc phosphate cement (n = 12); Group II, post prefabricated with # 1 intracanal glass fiber cemented with conventional glass ionomer cement, Vidrion C (n = 12); Group III, post prefabricated with # 1 intracanal glass fiber cemented with chemical action resin cement, Multilink (n = 12). Two groups of six teeth each were also included, one as negative control group and the other as positive control. After cementing, teeth were tested through a dual-chamber experimental model, using Enterococcus Faecalis for apical contamination. Results: The control groups behaved as expected: positive control group with total contamination in 11 days and negative control group without any contaminated specimen within observation time of 60 days. Group I showed microleakage in all specimens for up to 29 days (100%). Group II and Group III showed microleakage in 50 and 49 specimens (83.33% and 75%) respectively along the research time of 60 days. Group 1 showed microleakage in all specimens for up to 29 days (100%). Group 2 and Group 3 showed microleakage in 50 and 49 specimens (83.33% and 75%) respectively along the research time of 60 days. The Log-Rank test showed differences between Groups 1 and 2 (p<0.05) and between Groups 1 and 3 (p<0.05). However, there was no difference between Groups 2 and 3 (p> 0.05). The results showed higher delay in bacterial infiltration in Groups 2 and 3 when compared to Group 1. Conclusion: No cement completely prevented infiltration during the experimental period. Zinc phosphate cement had the lowest apical sealing capacity while glass ionomer cement and resin cement showed similar results.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 72%

Evaluation of Apical Contamination in Teeth with Prefabricated Posts Fixed with Different Dental Cements

Machado¹,

Alvarez-Leite²,

Seraidarian³

et al. 2015

Pesqui. bras. odontopediatria clín. integr.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, primary stability of inserted root canal posts is of major importance for the postendodontic restoration; consequently, the use of glass ionomer-based cements for clinical application should be questioned. In addition, the coronal sealing quality of adhesively luted posts is superior compared with that of conventionally luted posts (22).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Bond Strength of Fiber Posts after the Application of Erbium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Treatment and Gaseous Ozone to the Root Canal

Bitter

Noetzel

Volk

et al. 2008

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Nonetheless, it must be pointed out that the clinical use of zinc phosphate cement, as luting material for fiber posts, needs further investigation. It has already been shown to have a low potential for sealing the root canal wall and a lack of adhesion to the surface of the post (21,22).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Immediate and 24-Hour Evaluation of the Interfacial Strengths of Fiber Posts

Sadek

Goracci

Monticelli

et al. 2006

Journal of Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Microleakage along Glassix glass fibre posts cemented with three different materials assessed using a fluid transport system

Abstract: Canals with Glassix posts cemented with Variolink II and Fuji PLUS cement had the least leakage when assessed using a fluid transport system.

Cited by 9 publications

References 23 publications

Evaluation of Apical Contamination in Teeth with Prefabricated Posts Fixed with Different Dental Cements

Evaluation of Apical Contamination in Teeth with Prefabricated Posts Fixed with Different Dental Cements

Bond Strength of Fiber Posts after the Application of Erbium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Treatment and Gaseous Ozone to the Root Canal

Immediate and 24-Hour Evaluation of the Interfacial Strengths of Fiber Posts

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About