2019
DOI: 10.1002/jssc.201900132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfunnel‐filter‐based emulsification microextraction followed by gas chromatography for simple determination of organophosphorus pesticides in environmental water samples

Abstract: A simple and fast method named microfunnel-filter-based emulsification microextraction is introduced for an efficient determination of some organophosphorus pesticides including diazinon, malathion, and chlorpyrifos in the environmental samples including the river, sea, and well water. This method is based upon the dispersion of a low-toxicity organic solvent (dihexyl ether), as the extractant, in a high volume of an aqueous sample solution (45 mL). It is implemented without a centrifugation step, and using a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a more specific water sample, taken from rivers, we obtained, as minimum values of the limits of quantification, 3.5 × 10 −14 μg/mL and 2.06 × 10 −9 μg/mL for the biosensor based on QCM [77] and an AChE/AuNPs/VNSWCNTs biosensor [107]. Meanwhile, the quantification limits for gas chromatography methods correspond to 6.00 × 10 −3 μg/mL [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a more specific water sample, taken from rivers, we obtained, as minimum values of the limits of quantification, 3.5 × 10 −14 μg/mL and 2.06 × 10 −9 μg/mL for the biosensor based on QCM [77] and an AChE/AuNPs/VNSWCNTs biosensor [107]. Meanwhile, the quantification limits for gas chromatography methods correspond to 6.00 × 10 −3 μg/mL [42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two values are based on a gold nanoparticle/three-dimensional graphene film (AuNPs/rGO) [116], and the second pair of values is based on AuNPs, with a VNSWCNTs overlay [107]. All detections show quite low limits in contrast to a classical method, based on the micro-extraction of emulsion using a micro funnel filter, followed by CG [42] (8.00 × 10 −3 μg/mL, for MTH, and 1.30 × 10 −4 μg/mL for the MPHT method based on HPLC-DAD [23]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Talaee, Lorestani, Ramezani, Cheraghi, and Jamehbozorgi (2019) used microfunnel‐filter‐based emulsification microextraction coupled with GC to determine organophosphorus pesticides (OPs). This method was implemented with a syringe filter and a microfunnel, using dihexyl ether as the extractant, to achieve simple phase separation.…”
Section: Extraction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cleanup and preconcentration processes for trace analysis, due to the complexity of matrix and low amount of analyte, are essential. Various sample preparation techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE) and micro-solidphase extraction (µ-SPE) [20][21][22], liquid-liquid extraction (LLE), and liquid-liquid microextraction (LLME) [23][24][25][26], magnetic solid-phase extraction followed by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) [27], matrix solidphase dispersion (MSPD) [28], pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) [29], and electrochemical methods were reported for the determination of diazinon in different matrices [30,31]. SPE is an effective technique for the selective isolation and concentration of a wide range of analytes and sample matrices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%