2011
DOI: 10.1117/1.3607430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic sensing: state of the art fabrication and detection techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
140
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(140 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
(152 reference statements)
0
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In turn, injection molding involves the high-pressure injection of pre-polymerized molten thermoplastic granules into a heated molding cavity (Mair et al, 2006;Attia et al, 2009), which allows the high-throughput industry-scale fabrication of thermoplastic devices. A detailed description of microfabrication methods of lab-on-a-chip devices can be found elsewhere (Fiorini and Chiu, 2005;Kim et al, 2008a;Coltro et al, 2010;Sollier et al, 2011;Wu and Gu, 2011).…”
Section: Fabrication Methods and Materials Of Cell Chip Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In turn, injection molding involves the high-pressure injection of pre-polymerized molten thermoplastic granules into a heated molding cavity (Mair et al, 2006;Attia et al, 2009), which allows the high-throughput industry-scale fabrication of thermoplastic devices. A detailed description of microfabrication methods of lab-on-a-chip devices can be found elsewhere (Fiorini and Chiu, 2005;Kim et al, 2008a;Coltro et al, 2010;Sollier et al, 2011;Wu and Gu, 2011).…”
Section: Fabrication Methods and Materials Of Cell Chip Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A major advantage of lab-on-a-chip technology is that it allows the facile integration of optical, electrical, magnetic, and acoustical sensors for cell analysis (Wu and Gu, 2011). Routinely used immunofluorescence end-point analysis can now be extended with complementary, continuous monitoring techniques (Charwat et al, 2013a(Charwat et al, ,b, 2014Picher et al, 2013;Novak et al, 2015).…”
Section: Integrated Sensing Functions For Microfluidic Cell Analysis mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidic channels were cast from PDMS (1:10 base to cross-linker), which was degassed at a pressure of 5 mBar for 20 min. Prior to casting PDMS over the mold, the resin surface was passivated by depositing a fluorocarbon film in a reactive-ion etcher [27][28][29] (low pressure CHF 3 for 120 s at an RF power of 45 W). PDMS was next cast onto the passivated molds and baked at 70 C for 1 h. The cured material was then peeled from the mold and sonicated for 20 min in acetone to dissolve the embedded ABS tube and thereby produce a fully 3D fluidic channel of dimensions w ¼ 500 lm, t ¼ 100 lm, and h ¼ 1:3 mm [ Fig.…”
Section: -6951/2017/111(23)/234102/5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these approaches use electrochemical and optical methods. However, they have several drawbacks like nonlinear detection range, lack of sensitivity, non-specific detection and complexity of integration [1][2][3]. The other approaches use mechanical and magnetic based methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%