2016
DOI: 10.1038/srep27970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microfluidic Assessment of Frying Oil Degradation

Abstract: Monitoring the quality of frying oil is important for the health of consumers. This paper reports a microfluidic technique for rapidly quantifying the degradation of frying oil. The microfluidic device generates monodispersed water-in-oil droplets and exploits viscosity and interfacial tension changes of frying oil samples over their frying/degradation process. The measured parameters were correlated to the total polar material percentage that is widely used in the food industry. The results reveal that the st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After twelve hours of total frying, five frying oil samples were obtained, as shown in Figure 3a, including one original oil sample and four used oil samples. The TPMs of the frying oil samples were measured with a commercially available Testo 270 (Testo Inc., Baden-Württemberg, Germany) [8,17,34], and results are shown in Figure 3b. As viscosity was also a possible TPM indicator, oil viscosities were also measured with a rotary viscometer at room temperature (21.8 • C, NDJ-79; Shanghai Changji Geological Instrument Co., Shanghai, China), as shown in Figure 3c,d, providing different ways of evaluating our device's accuracy.…”
Section: Frying Oil Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After twelve hours of total frying, five frying oil samples were obtained, as shown in Figure 3a, including one original oil sample and four used oil samples. The TPMs of the frying oil samples were measured with a commercially available Testo 270 (Testo Inc., Baden-Württemberg, Germany) [8,17,34], and results are shown in Figure 3b. As viscosity was also a possible TPM indicator, oil viscosities were also measured with a rotary viscometer at room temperature (21.8 • C, NDJ-79; Shanghai Changji Geological Instrument Co., Shanghai, China), as shown in Figure 3c,d, providing different ways of evaluating our device's accuracy.…”
Section: Frying Oil Samplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This relationship leads to increased viscosity and decreased interfacial tension, which are two factors that are considered useful indicators of frying oil quality in conjunction with TPM [10][11][12][13][14]. Other researchers have developed pore-based wicking sensors [15,16] and microfluidic methods [17,18], which function based on changing viscosity and interfacial tension and proved feasible for frying oil evaluation as their correlation with TPM is also quite satisfactory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At specific flow rates, deionised water is squeezed and cut into dispersed water‐in‐oil droplets at the flow intersection (Anna, ; Chong et al ., ; Costa et al ., ; Negou et al ., ). The droplets’ dimension depends on the channel structure, size, flow rates, viscosity and interfacial tension, which can be estimated as follows (the cross‐section is square) (Cubaud & Mason, ; Liu et al ., ): dw=m(normalα2Ca2)n where d is the steady‐state longitudinal dimension of droplet; w and h are the width and depth of main channel; m , n (negative) are the constants associated with flow channel; α 2 (α 2 = Q 2 /( Q 1 + Q 2 ) is the volume fraction of sample oil ( Q 1 and Q 2 are the flow rates, as shown in Fig. ); Ca 2 is the capillary number of continuous phase oil ( Ca 2 = η 2 J 2 /γ 12 : η 2 is viscosity of the continuous phase, J 2 (= Q 2 / wh ) is the average flow velocity of continuous phase, and γ 12 is the interfacial tension between the two phases).…”
Section: Principlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microfluidic viscometers can address the challenges of conventional viscometers by taking advantages of microfluidics such as small device footprint, ease of use, and low sample consumption. They can be categorized by their geometry: a simple capillary channel [ 12 , 13 ], a microfluidic comparator [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], a droplet generator [ 19 , 20 ], a flow focuser [ 21 ], and a pressure sensor-integrated microchannel [ 22 ]. Viscometers that are based on a simple capillary channel utilize the dependence of the resulting fluid velocity of a test liquid on its viscosity under a known capillary pressure [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the fluid streams in the comparators depend on their viscosity ratio, the unknown viscosity can be determined by comparing their relative flow rate or the equilibrium position of the fluid interface. Droplet-based viscometers have been developed by exploiting the fact that the size of water-in-oil droplets generated through a micro-nozzle is highly affected by aqueous-phase and oil-phase viscosities [ 19 , 20 ]. A microfluidic flow focuser has been used to measure viscosity by monitoring the diffusion of tracer particles under a laminar flow condition [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%