2016
DOI: 10.1002/2016gc006271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microearthquake activity, lithospheric structure, and deformation modes at an amagmatic ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge segment

Abstract: While nascent oceanic lithosphere at slow to fast spreading mid‐ocean ridges (MOR) is relatively well studied, much less is known about the lithospheric structure and properties at ultraslow MORs. Here we present microearthquake data from a 1 year ocean bottom seismometer deployment at the amagmatic, oblique supersegment of the ultraslow spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. A refraction seismic experiment was performed to constrain upper lithosphere P‐velocities and results were used to construct a 1D velocity mo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(111 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our tomography results reveal high‐velocity anomalies beneath the detachment fault at Segment 28 (Figures , S11, and S12), which Zhao et al () suggested is composed primarily of gabbro. Moreover, compared to the oblique Supersegment of the SWIR (Schmid & Schlindwein, ), which is underlain by a thick aseismic lithosphere (~15 km), our aseismic zone is thinner (~5 km). At the TAG and 13°20′ detachments on the MAR, the aseismic zones are much thinner (~3 km; deMartin et al, ; Parnell‐Turner et al, ), which may indeed be a result of a mostly gabbroic crust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our tomography results reveal high‐velocity anomalies beneath the detachment fault at Segment 28 (Figures , S11, and S12), which Zhao et al () suggested is composed primarily of gabbro. Moreover, compared to the oblique Supersegment of the SWIR (Schmid & Schlindwein, ), which is underlain by a thick aseismic lithosphere (~15 km), our aseismic zone is thinner (~5 km). At the TAG and 13°20′ detachments on the MAR, the aseismic zones are much thinner (~3 km; deMartin et al, ; Parnell‐Turner et al, ), which may indeed be a result of a mostly gabbroic crust.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In general, the deepest microearthquakes (with reference to the seafloor) are known to occur in the crust/shallow mantle at fast‐/slow‐spreading ridges: for example, 1.8 km at 9°50′N on the fast‐spreading East Pacific Rise (EPR; Bohnenstiehl et al, ; Tolstoy et al, ), 4 km at 35°N on the slow‐spreading Mid‐Atlantic Ridge (MAR; Barclay et al, ), 6 km at 14°45′N on the MAR (Grevemeyer et al, ), 7–8 km at 26°N and 5°S on the MAR (deMartin et al, ; Kong et al, ; Tilmann et al, ; Toomey et al, ), and 10 km at 13°20′N on the MAR (Parnell‐Turner et al, ). By contrast, microseismicity at ultraslow‐spreading ridges tends to feature deep hypocenters: for example, 14 km at the Lena Trough (Läderach et al, ), 15 km at the Segment 8 volcano of the SWIR (Schmid et al, ), 20 km beneath the Knipovich Ridge (Schlindwein et al, ), and 31 km at the orthogonal supersegment of the SWIR (Schmid & Schlindwein, ). From our results in Figures and , the maximum focal depth is ~20 km below the seafloor (bsf) or equivalently 16 km below the Moho discontinuity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations