1988
DOI: 10.2307/3577289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdosimetric Aspects of 0.3- to 20-MeV Proton Tracks: I. Crossers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They can be explained by the fact that in nanometre-sized target volumes at larger impact parameters the cluster-size distributions are due to single δ-electrons the energies of which do not strongly depend on the average of the primary particles' velocity. Similar results were also obtained for much larger target volumes in the proportional-counter experiments mentioned above, for smaller target volumes by Bashkirov et al (2009), and in previous Monte Carlo simulations concerning the frequency of energy deposition events produced in small sites by high-energy δ-electrons (Kellerer and Chmelevsky 1975, Wilson et al 1988, Wilson 1994, Wilson and Paretzke 1994, Wang et al 2006. The results of these simulations show that, although the energy distribution of δ-electrons set in motion by primary particles depends on their velocity, the energy deposited by δ-electrons in small sites is relatively independent of the particles' velocity and of the impact parameter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…They can be explained by the fact that in nanometre-sized target volumes at larger impact parameters the cluster-size distributions are due to single δ-electrons the energies of which do not strongly depend on the average of the primary particles' velocity. Similar results were also obtained for much larger target volumes in the proportional-counter experiments mentioned above, for smaller target volumes by Bashkirov et al (2009), and in previous Monte Carlo simulations concerning the frequency of energy deposition events produced in small sites by high-energy δ-electrons (Kellerer and Chmelevsky 1975, Wilson et al 1988, Wilson 1994, Wilson and Paretzke 1994, Wang et al 2006. The results of these simulations show that, although the energy distribution of δ-electrons set in motion by primary particles depends on their velocity, the energy deposited by δ-electrons in small sites is relatively independent of the particles' velocity and of the impact parameter.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The significant difference from our plots is due to the underestimation, found above, of in [10] for large radial distances. On the other hand our results agree with the Monte Carlo simulations of [36] for protons crossing water spheres. The small systematic shift of to higher values in [36] can be attributed to the somewhat larger ranges of the -electron in water and to the spherical shape of the nanometric volume used there while our is for a cylinder.…”
Section: Spatial Track Structuresupporting
confidence: 90%
“…It was obtained by averaging over several thousands of proton trajectories. This might not be a good way to describe the energy deposition by a single ion, for which calculations of the so called microdosimetric event-size distributions were presented in [35], [36]. Yet, well characterizes the energy deposition in silicon, with dimensions larger than 50 nm, by single protons with…”
Section: Spatial Track Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have done this, usinga detailed-histories,MonteCarlo methodfor electron transport (slowing down of _!ectronsisfollowedby computingevery elasticand inelasticinteraction) (Paretzke 1987;Wilson et al, 1988); the Vavilovdistributionis not used. lt is not computationally tractable to compute in the MeV electron energy rangewith detailed histories,however.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%