2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdialysis sampling of cytokines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
98
0
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
98
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The group of Stenken has made important contributions to the area. Among other things, the group found that the membrane provides more of the resistance to transport for larger macromolecules, than the tissue movement, thus different from small molecules (91,92). A theoretical and in vitro investigation of transmembrane convection with diffusion was made by Bungay et al with the 100-kDa molecular weight cut-off membranes, as a modification of sampling large molecules (51).…”
Section: Development Of Microdialysis and Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The group of Stenken has made important contributions to the area. Among other things, the group found that the membrane provides more of the resistance to transport for larger macromolecules, than the tissue movement, thus different from small molecules (91,92). A theoretical and in vitro investigation of transmembrane convection with diffusion was made by Bungay et al with the 100-kDa molecular weight cut-off membranes, as a modification of sampling large molecules (51).…”
Section: Development Of Microdialysis and Alternativesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the remarkable specificity of enzyme-based amperometric biosensors can be seriously undermined by interference from electroactive species present in the target medium, compromising the selectivity of the device. This problem is particularly pronounced for biosensors implanted in biological tissues for realtime monitoring [9,10,13,14], because separation techniques cannot be exploited to eliminate the interference, as is the case for on-line microdialysis approaches to in-vivo monitoring [8,[15][16][17]. Despite this drawback, considerable efforts have been made over the past two decades to overcome issues of in-vivo biosensor sensitivity, selectivity and stability, mainly because of the significant benefits of biosensor monitoring: small probe size, minimizing tissue damage [18][19][20]; and high time resolution, allowing real-time correlation with animal behavior [8,10,13,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MD is well established as a clinical sampling tool for monitoring small hydrophilic molecules such as lactate, puruvate and glucose in neurointensive care settings (Hillered et al 2005;Helmy et al 2007). There is a growing interest in monitoring larger and more complicated molecules such as neuropeptides (Rosdahl et al 2000;Dahlin et al 2004;Schutte et al 2004), cytokines (Ao and Stenken 2006) and proteins (Kjellstrom et al 1999;Clough et al 2007;Dahlin et al 2010). Monitoring larger molecules requires ultra-filtration or microfiltration membranes with molecular weight cut off (MWCO) of 100 kDa or above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%