2015
DOI: 10.1111/cga.12080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdeletion 2q23.3q24.1: Exploring genotype‐phenotype correlations

Abstract: We report a case of a 13-year-old girl with a 5.4Mb de novo deletion, encompassing bands 2q23.3q24.1, identified by array-comparative genomic hybridization. She presented with minor facial and digital anomalies, mild developmental delay during infancy, and behavioral disorders. Few of the reported cases overlap this deletion and all only partially. We tried to compare the clinical features of the patient with the other cases, even though not all of them were molecularly characterized in detail. Considering the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
8
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A larger part of the deleted region identified in this study overlapped with the deletion reported by Milani et al (Fig. 2) (Milani et al 2015). Furthermore, the main clinical feature of language delay was also similar to that observed in two patients (Table 1) (Lybaek et al 2009;Newbury et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A larger part of the deleted region identified in this study overlapped with the deletion reported by Milani et al (Fig. 2) (Milani et al 2015). Furthermore, the main clinical feature of language delay was also similar to that observed in two patients (Table 1) (Lybaek et al 2009;Newbury et al 2009).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, the main clinical feature of language delay was also similar to that observed in two patients (Table ) (Lybæk et al ; Newbury et al ). However, the deletion identified in this study extended toward a more distal region, and the developmental delay (DD) observed in the present patient was more severe than that in the patient described by Milani et al (Milani et al ). The language delay observed in the patient described by Milani et al in the infantile period improved later (Milani et al ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 3 more Smart Citations