1999
DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199911010-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microdecompression for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis

Abstract: Lumbar microdecompression is a minimally invasive technique that appears to provide excellent functional outcomes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
124
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kleeman et al (17) used such a technique and their overall results at 2.5 years post-operatively, according to modified meta-analysis criteria, were good to excellent in 84 % of the patients. In a study by Weiner et al (25) using microsurgical technique with preservation of the supra-/interspinous ligament complex and the contralateral musculature 43 % of the patients were very satisfied and another 43 % fairly satisfied. In another study by the same group (24), bilateral muscle retraction was used together with osteotomies of the spinal processes followed by laminotomies and "trumpeted" decompression without use of the microscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kleeman et al (17) used such a technique and their overall results at 2.5 years post-operatively, according to modified meta-analysis criteria, were good to excellent in 84 % of the patients. In a study by Weiner et al (25) using microsurgical technique with preservation of the supra-/interspinous ligament complex and the contralateral musculature 43 % of the patients were very satisfied and another 43 % fairly satisfied. In another study by the same group (24), bilateral muscle retraction was used together with osteotomies of the spinal processes followed by laminotomies and "trumpeted" decompression without use of the microscope.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some such techniques in which laminotomies are performed instead of laminectomies, have shown promising results (2). Although applied mostly in cases of lateral recess stenosis (4,5), laminotomy has recently been used to treat central stenosis as well (22,25).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laminectomy is the standard option for surgical decompression of spinal stenosis. However, traditional laminectomy involves extensive removal of the posterior elements including the lamina, spinous processes, superspinous ligaments, interspinous ligaments, and even facet joints, which may result in iatrogenic spinal instability [16,17]. Foraminotomy has become increasingly popular for treatment of patients with lumbar stenosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preservation of the posterior spinal elements is the most important factor for successful decompression surgery of lumbar canal stenosis (LCS). Some authors have reported good clinical outcomes following microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach (MBDU), a less invasive technique preserving the posterior elements, including the paravertebral muscle, facet joints, and lamina [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Some studies have also reported the clinical results of MBDU for LCS in mild instability cases, such as spondylolisthesis and complications from haemodialysis [7,8], but there are few reports examining complications after MBDU or risk factors that might preclude certain patients from MBDU.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%