2020
DOI: 10.21163/gt_2020.151.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microclimate Models to Predict the Contribution of Facade Materials to the Canopy Layer Heat Island in Hot-Humid Areas

Abstract: This paper aims to study a microclimate model for predicting the role of façade materials to the Canopy Layer Heat Island. ENVI-met was selected to model the microclimate of four street canyons in Yogyakarta, which vary in façade materials, street orientation, and land cover. Three to four-day field measurements in each canyon were intended to obtain microclimate data at pedestrian level, wind speed and orientation at the boundary layer for simulation input and validation. The validation study confirms the acc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, ENVI-met is used by landscape architects and urban planners as a decision support instrument for urban recommendations in which contemporary demands of climate adaptation and mitigation aspects are considered. ENVI-met has been widely validated through numerous studies under various climate conditions, including temperate climates [75] and more extreme weather conditions [76][77][78]. ENVI-met has also demonstrated a good match with experimental data [79,80].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Accordingly, ENVI-met is used by landscape architects and urban planners as a decision support instrument for urban recommendations in which contemporary demands of climate adaptation and mitigation aspects are considered. ENVI-met has been widely validated through numerous studies under various climate conditions, including temperate climates [75] and more extreme weather conditions [76][77][78]. ENVI-met has also demonstrated a good match with experimental data [79,80].…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%