2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0031-3203(03)00230-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic and scale space approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cheng et al (25) use a three-layer, feed-forward, error BP-ANN in order to classify the detected clusters of microcalcifications using as inputs the mean and the standard deviation and achieves an accuracy >97% TP rate with the FP rate of three clusters per image. The mammographic database they use is the Nijmegen database.…”
Section: Multiscale Texture Features Extraction -Wavelet Based Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cheng et al (25) use a three-layer, feed-forward, error BP-ANN in order to classify the detected clusters of microcalcifications using as inputs the mean and the standard deviation and achieves an accuracy >97% TP rate with the FP rate of three clusters per image. The mammographic database they use is the Nijmegen database.…”
Section: Multiscale Texture Features Extraction -Wavelet Based Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The texture discriminatory power of wavelet transform leads to significant improvement in computer assisted diagnosis in digitized mammograms. Fuzzy and scale space based approaches for detection of micro-calcification have been proposed by Cheng et al (2004). Based on fuzzy entropy the image is fuzzified and further the image is enhanced and classified using scale space and Gaussian filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, focusing on image segmentation and specification of regions of interest (ROI), several methods have been proposed, such as classical image filter and local threshold [3,4], and techniques based on mathematical morphology [5], fractal models [6], optimal filters [7], wavelet analysis and multi-scale analysis [3]. Various classification approaches have also been presented to characterize MCs, such as rule-based systems [8], fuzzy logic systems [9,10], statistical methods based on Markov random fields(MRF) [11], and support vector machines [12]. In the past decade, most of the work reported in the literatures has employed neural networks in MCs characterization [5,13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%